The most pressing topic revolved around the acquisition of the property on Fair Road, located adjacent to the dock. The board discussed plans for the demolition of an unsafe structure on the site and the stabilization of the surrounding area. This included the potential use of natural shoreline stabilization versus traditional bulkheading methods, which would depend on the intended recreational uses of the space such as crabbing, fishing, or kayaking. The board acknowledged the property’s current safety concerns, which included warning signage and fencing. Members highlighted the necessity of reviewing the project, emphasizing the importance of aligning the development with the master plan, particularly as public funds would be involved.

A notable aspect of the discussion was the board’s coordination with Narian Associates to prepare bid documents for the demolition and to incorporate a septic report into the plan. The borough aimed to apply for funding from Monmouth County to support this initiative. Public open houses were scheduled to gather community input on the project, with the next meetings set to avoid conflicts with the Memorial Day weekend. The community’s engagement in this process is essential, as it will inform future decisions about the property’s use.

In addition to the stabilization efforts, the board concentrated on the broader planning and zoning implications for the development of the park. The necessity of understanding the zoning designation of the site was stressed, as a special use permit might be needed to accommodate the intended use. The discussion considered creating an overlay for the zone to clarify permitted activities and ensure consistency with the master plan. There was a call for an engineering or planner’s report to outline feasible options for the park, referencing previous park developments as a framework.

The board also addressed concerns about practical elements such as parking and access, with considerations for bike ramps and visitor accommodations to enhance the community experience.

The integration of insights from a subcommittee advisory document was emphasized. The board recognized the importance of a structured approach to gathering comments, with the idea of a collaborative Google document proposed for members to contribute thoughts and concerns before subsequent meetings.

In a related matter, the board addressed the timeline for the master plan re-examination and the housing element and fair share plan. There was a mention of a key deadline on June 10th, with the amended housing element expected to inform the broader planning process. The timeline for acquiring necessary documentation was identified, with hopes of action by July.