The discussion about using Zoom for board meetings sparked varying opinions. While some board members saw the benefits of increased public participation and transparency, others raised concerns about the limitations of virtual participation for both board members and the public. Concerns were raised about whether remote attendees could contribute effectively to discussions and decision-making processes. The debate also touched on the legal aspects of voting for members joining via Zoom and the potential for public comment to become challenging to manage. Despite differences, the board agreed to move forward with integrating conferencing technology.

The conversation then shifted to the issue of blight in the town, specifically discussing distressed vacant properties on River Road. Board members discussed their jurisdiction and the extent of their involvement in making recommendations to the governing body. They acknowledged the need to reexamine the master plan and involve the public and other town committees in this process. Members suggested adding a section on blight to the master plan to address the issue in the future. It was acknowledged that the responsibility to address blight falls under the council and ordinance enforcement, leading to a suggestion to write a letter to the council highlighting the blight issues observed in the borough.

The topic of setbacks on River Road was brought to the fore by a concerned property owner who felt that the current planning standards could lead to unfavorable building outcomes. The discussion included the potential impact of different property groups owned by a single person being sold simultaneously, which could affect the town’s aesthetics and engagement. Members emphasized the urgency in addressing the “hodgepodge” of setbacks to maintain the desired scale and feel of the town. There was also talk of potentially bringing buildings closer to the road to encourage community engagement and spending. Furthermore, the property owner suggested that the board could utilize its expertise to work through the master plan and recommend changes, highlighting the need to streamline the variance process.

The board also reflected on their experience with the historical commission and the need for the town’s regulations to adapt to changes in the housing landscape. They discussed the variance process and its challenges, including the financial and uncertainty barriers property owners might face when seeking improvements. Members recognized the importance of making codified changes to facilitate property improvements, especially for young families.

In action items, the board planned to discuss the Zoom rule, review the master plan, and schedule outreach at the next meeting. They also agreed to examine specific ordinances related to blight and setbacks, with an emphasis on not creating additional burdens for property owners.