The most notable topic at the meeting was the need to address the damage caused by deer to newly planted trees. Participants expressed concerns about the effectiveness of current protective measures, such as gator bags and fencing. The cost of the fencing was discussed, with an estimate of $5 per tree, though it was unclear if this included the necessary stakes. There was a consensus on the importance of ensuring every new tree planted had protective fencing. One participant recounted observing deer damage to a maple tree in Fernbrook, emphasizing the prevalence of deer, particularly large bucks, and the challenges in protecting young trees.

A member named Bonnie joined the discussion to share her recent experience with deer damage at a cell tower site, where she provided additional fencing to protect the trees. She highlighted the insufficient maintenance of existing fencing and the urgency of implementing more effective protective measures. The conversation also explored different types of fencing, such as snow fencing with wooden slats, to provide a more robust barrier against deer.

The aesthetic impact of protective measures was also considered, with concerns raised about the current unattractive combination of protective tubing and water bags. Bonnie advocated for removing gator bags in winter to allow rain to reach the roots, while others called for a clearer understanding of responsibilities for tree care. The discussion revealed a need for improved public communication and resources, such as instructional videos, to assist homeowners in protecting their trees.

Another issue was the ambiguity surrounding the definition of “hazardous” trees. A significant conversation emerged about tree removal permits, especially concerning the removal of a large oak tree on H Road. The tree was reportedly healthy, prompting a debate about the criteria for designating trees as hazardous. The possibility of a “hazard” designation being applied too liberally was raised, with suggestions to review and possibly tighten the ordinance’s definitions. The commission acknowledged the importance of understanding the impact of tree removal on stormwater management and agreed to revisit the ordinance to ensure clearer and more consistent criteria for tree removals and replacements.

In planning for Fair Haven’s 250th anniversary, the commission discussed a project to plant 250 trees or consider other commemorative ideas. However, there was skepticism about the feasibility of planting 250 trees, with alternative suggestions like community events and collaborations with neighboring towns. The idea of a “tree canopy competition” was proposed to increase awareness and participation in tree planting. Concerns about logistics and community capacity to plant such a large number of trees led to suggestions for a collective effort, including encouraging residents to contribute to the goal.

The commission also explored the idea of honoring historical trees in the community, such as those over 250 years old. There was a proposal to mark these trees with QR codes linking to information about their species and historical significance. This initiative aimed to enhance public awareness and foster community pride in local heritage.

Additionally, updates were provided on the Fair Haven Road cherry trees. Improper pruning by a contractor had led to tree damage, prompting recommendations for removal and replacement. The community’s reaction to the situation was noted, with the mayor and council committed to addressing the issue. The commission expressed a desire to maintain continuity with the cherry trees while considering broader ecological strategies for new plantings.

Public comments reinforced the need for replacing hazardous trees and considering the impact of planting in right-of-ways due to upcoming infrastructure projects.