Central to the meeting was the applicant’s proposal to convert the former bank building into a wellness facility, which would include a personal training business operated by Mike Duffy. The application called for variances and adjustments to accommodate the change in use from the original 1968 resolution, which had permitted the building to function as a bank with a single user. The board scrutinized the revised plans, which proposed new uses for both the ground floor and the second story of the building.

The board’s deliberations touched on the practicality and sufficiency of the proposed parking plan. Concerns were raised about the layout’s ability to handle traffic flow and whether the parking spaces were ample for the anticipated use. Discussions also included the possibility of offsite parking on Smith Street and River Road, as well as the impact of having two separate tenants in the building, with a focus on whether the space would be considered as having minimal parking needs.

The board engaged in an in-depth examination of the exterior modifications of the building, including the preservation of the existing slate roof and brick veneer, and the restoration of the existing cupola. The potential addition of a weather vane featuring an osprey was debated for its potential to increase the building’s height and the need for a variance. Interior changes were also discussed, particularly the treatment of the glass entrance and the modifications to the building’s layout, including the removal and addition of bathrooms.

The lighting and signage plans were a point of contention, with debates over the necessity of exterior lighting and the impact on the residential area. The board discussed the size, height, and location of the proposed signage in relation to the residential zoning regulations, with some members suggesting alternative solutions to minimize visual impact.

Additionally, the board considered a request for an extension to a house renovation project by Mr. Sean G, which was granted for 12 months from the current date.

Resident concerns played a role, especially regarding historical challenges with drainage and runoff during rain events. The board revisited the 1968 resolution and the conditions attached to the Certificate of Occupancy issued at the time, including fencing, lighting, and signage. Residents also expressed apprehensions about noise, outdoor exercise activities, and the impact of business hours on the residential area.

The meeting concluded with administrative matters, including the approval of contracts for the planner, attorney, and engineer, mirroring the previous year’s contracts, and plans to set a special meeting date to address unresolved issues. The board agreed to finalize scheduling through email communication.