One notable issue discussed was the proposal to establish fees for trolley services, aimed at enhancing the city’s transportation options and promoting tourism. The council deliberated on setting up a fee structure that would include an app with tracking capabilities for trolley users, raising the question of whether a senior rate could be considered. The conversation also covered potential trolley tours. Further, the council explored the idea of offering a reduced rate for school rentals of the trolley, discussing the logistics of a base full-day and half-day rental, along with the availability of a dedicated trolley driver and insurance requirements.

In addition to the trolley fee structure, the council discussed the implementation of a property maintenance ordinance. The ordinance aimed to consolidate various regulations to streamline enforcement and provide a comprehensive framework for addressing property maintenance. The council examined the impact of the ordinance on both residential and commercial properties, emphasizing the need for clarity to ensure that the ordinance effectively addressed a wider range of property-related issues, including public health and safety concerns. The discussion extended to the responsibilities of landlords and homeowners in maintaining their properties and the requirement for contact information for non-owner-occupied properties.

Another topic was the city’s demolition delay ordinance, particularly concerning city-owned properties. The council debated the effectiveness of the current ordinance and the inclusion of commercial properties. Members discussed whether the ordinance should extend the time before a demolition permit can be granted and considered the financial implications of securing buildings for an extended period. Input from the historical commission and preservation society members underscored the importance of leading by example and engaging the public in understanding the purpose of demolition delays. The council also pondered the need for clarity in the ordinance regarding the qualification of city-owned properties for demolition delay and the potential financial burden on the city.

The future of the Armory building was a subject of discussion, with the council considering the formation of a committee to develop plans for its use. The conversation included the roles of the Historical Commission and the Preservation Society, potential uses for the building, and the importance of community feedback. The possibility of applying for state grants or Community Preservation Committee (CPC) funding to support the development of the Armory was also discussed.

Additionally, the council addressed street opening requests related to gas utility infrastructure aimed at reducing the loss of unaccounted gas. Despite some frustration expressed about communication and approval for new construction projects and their impact on the community, the street opening requests were approved.

Finally, the council touched on a ballot question concerning the new Diamond High School, which did not pass. The City Council then moved to adjourn the meeting.