The debate over trolley ticket pricing was particularly detailed. City Administrator Seth Aken provided insights into the operational costs of the trolley, stating that it costs around $436 on a normal operating day, excluding maintenance and wear and tear. To keep the service sustainable, the council discussed maintaining a $5 ticket for adults and $2 for children, considering discounts for seniors and veterans. Aken emphasized the need for sufficient rates to maintain the trolley’s operations and condition. A council member humorously suggested that seniors could be classified as anyone over 40, but the conversation soon returned to more practical considerations.

One motion proposed setting the senior rate at 65 years old while eliminating the $2 fee for children under 12. However, concerns about unsupervised children led to reconsideration of free rides. Another council member suggested a flat fee for senior centers or veterans organizations renting the trolley for events.

Concerns about affordability were raised, especially for seniors and veterans on fixed incomes. A council member noted the high cost of $60 for a couple to participate in a special event, which could deter attendance. The potential for discounted rates during special events was discussed, with the aim of balancing revenue needs with accessibility for vulnerable populations. The trolley service, seen as a discretionary option rather than essential transportation, further complicated justifications for subsidies or discounts.

In another discussion, the council addressed a proposed ordinance on unauthorized camping and homelessness. The debate emphasized the need for a balanced approach to penalizing homeless individuals versus providing adequate shelter. One speaker expressed concern about the inhumanity of criminalizing homelessness, referring to a Supreme Court ruling that did not consider the availability of shelter. Issues such as cohabitation rules, restrictions on pets, and sobriety requirements often deter homeless individuals from using available shelters.

The council discussed public safety, particularly on the Alfred Lima bike path, where residents felt unsafe due to homeless encampments. It was suggested that designated areas where homeless individuals cannot stay should be identified, and those refusing shelter need to be relocated. A council member noted the impracticality of collecting fines from homeless individuals. The need for more shelter beds in Fall River was emphasized, along with frustration about the perception of limited shelter availability.

The council also evaluated the city’s responsibilities in managing encampments and cleaning up problematic areas. The proposed ordinance aimed to provide clear authority for such actions, addressing previous legal constraints. The broader context of homelessness, including mental health and substance abuse issues, was acknowledged, with calls for measures to encourage individuals to seek help and move away from encampments.

Lastly, the council discussed short-term rentals, particularly in light of ongoing legal issues with properties like the Jerbec House. The current city position prohibits short-term rentals unless explicitly authorized by the council. Concerns were raised about property owners converting single-family homes into multiple rental units and the need for zoning enforcement to maintain community integrity.