Fall River Planning Board Approves Subdivision of Nuisance Property to Resolve Back Taxes

In a concise meeting on May 14, 2025, the Fall River Planning Board approved several land subdivision applications, including one for a property on Holland Street known for its past issues with back taxes and maintenance. This decision is expected to facilitate the resolution of these problems by creating two parcels, one of which will continue to host the existing single-family dwelling. The variance granted allows for the creation of a second lot that does not meet standard frontage and area requirements. The board expressed approval for the applicant’s efforts to address the property’s history and bring it into compliance.

09:58Another noteworthy approval involved a property on Detroit Street, where the board endorsed a plan to subdivide a large lot into three parcels, two of which are nonbuildable and to be conveyed to an adjacent owner. This will leave the existing residence on a conforming lot. The board noted the practical advantage of acquiring additional adjoining land, emphasizing the rarity of such opportunities.

01:59Additionally, the board approved the subdivision of a property on Jones Street into two parcels following the receipt of zoning relief. This approval was straightforward as the submitted plan complied with zoning variances, leading to a unanimous vote in favor.

03:38The meeting also addressed the subdivision of a property on Goodwin Street, which involved creating a second parcel from a singular piece of land. As with the other applications, this too was approved unanimously after confirming compliance with past zoning relief.

05:29Finally, the board approved a subdivision at 84 and Everett Street, as well as 310 Alden Street. This involved granting a special permit for the subdivision of parcels containing multifamily dwellings, with a focus on maintaining access through an easement. This proposal also received unanimous approval.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: