The meeting’s primary focus was on the proposal by Tetro Real Estate LLC to develop three lots, including two duplexes and a single-family home, on Mis Street. Represented by attorney Peter Selino, the proposal sought variances for lot area, rear yard setbacks, and lot coverage. Selino argued the hardship stemmed from existing structures limiting development options. However, residents voiced strong objections, emphasizing the neighborhood’s single-family home environment. Elizabeth Cabral, a local homeowner, expressed deep concerns, stating the development would disrupt the area’s safety and character, while another resident, Col Calo, argued that even reducing the project to one duplex would still be excessive.

The community’s opposition was underscored by a letter from 13 neighbors, highlighting concerns about overcrowding and decreased property values. They emphasized that the existing infrastructure, lacking sufficient street parking and sidewalks, would struggle to accommodate the proposed increase in residents. The board deliberated on whether the claimed hardship warranted the requested variances, with one member questioning the validity of financial incentives as a basis for hardship. The board opted to table the petition to explore alternative development options, such as single-family homes.

In another significant agenda item, the board evaluated a proposal to transform a historic building on Park Street into 68 residential units. The applicant requested variances for lot area and dimensional requirements, alongside a special permit to reduce parking from 336 to 75 spaces. The building, historically a convent, required substantial renovation, with costs estimated at $17 million. Ken Foler, representing Bristol County, supported the project, citing potential benefits for medical professionals working nearby. However, parking concerns were a focal point, with discussions on utilizing nearby facilities to mitigate shortages. The board expressed interest in the project, aligning with the city’s goals for market-rate housing, and unanimously approved the variances, contingent on addressing parking and infrastructure challenges.

The meeting also addressed a variance request from Mass 1 LLC to expand a non-conforming use from 11 to 16 apartments on Pleasant Street. Legal and operational aspects were discussed, particularly ensuring that additional rooms in the proposed units adhered to zoning codes. The board approved the request with restrictions.

Further discussions included a variance request by Shaker Investments LLC to replace a non-conforming warehouse with a two-family dwelling on Woodbine Place. The board evaluated parking and traffic concerns, ultimately supporting the proposal with unanimous approval. Additionally, Marilla Lopes sought a variance to convert a garage into a one-station hair salon on Plain Street, prompting discussions on parking and signage. The board approved the variance with conditions to ensure the salon remained owner-operated and adhered to operational guidelines.