The approved variance allows for the conversion of the first-floor office space into three additional residential units, adding to the existing four units in the building. The property sits in a mixed zoning area, with part of it designated BL local business and another part R4 two-family residential. The variance was necessary because the BL district does not permit seven or more units by right. The applicant’s representative, Peter Felino, assured the board that no parking relief was needed since the property’s layout could accommodate the required parking for the additional units.

During the public comment period, a resident expressed significant concern for pedestrian safety, particularly noting the high traffic volume and the lack of adequate crosswalks near the intersection. He highlighted an incident involving his elderly father, who was hit by a car, to illustrate the risks posed by the current traffic conditions. The resident suggested that city officials consider safety improvements, such as additional crosswalks or flashing stop signs, to address these concerns.

In response, a board member noted that the residential use might generate less traffic than a potential commercial tenant, such as the dentist office previously proposed for the space. Felino emphasized that the property’s existing structure and neighborhood conditions warranted the variance, pointing out that the area is predominantly residential.

The board deliberated on whether the conversion would alter the traffic patterns, eventually approving the variance with assurances that safety concerns would be taken into account. This decision marked a critical moment in the meeting.

In another major development, the board reviewed a proposal to demolish an existing commercial garage on Higgins Street and construct a three-unit townhouse. The project required variances for front yard and side yard setbacks, as well as lot coverage. The plan included three stories with each unit having a two-car garage, designed to meet off-street parking requirements. Despite engineering concerns about ledge proximity and the absence of water and sewer infrastructure, the board approved the variance after discussing the potential benefits of removing a commercial use from the residential area.

The board also addressed a request from RE New Realty Services LLC to reestablish a former ice cream shop on Globe Street, which had been closed since 2008. The proposal sought a special permit to reinstate the ice cream parlor’s use and waive off-street parking requirements due to property constraints. The board considered implementing a 15-minute parking zone in front of the establishment to enhance customer access, eventually approving the permit with conditions to maintain its walk-up nature and minimize parking disruptions.

Meanwhile, discussions about a residential construction proposal on Crescent Street raised zoning issues related to setback requirements and parking adequacy. Public comments brought attention to existing traffic congestion and safety concerns, particularly from residents directly affected by the potential changes.