The most contentious topic was the proposal to transform the vacant lot into a Wendy’s restaurant. Stakeholders expressed conflicting viewpoints, primarily focusing on traffic and safety concerns. The site, which sits in a strategic location between significant commercial centers, is already known for its challenging traffic conditions. Concerns were raised about the safety of proposed access points, specifically the potential hazards of a four-foot drop from the parking area to the sidewalk. Proponents suggested using an existing sidewalk to mitigate risks, though it was acknowledged that pedestrians might still opt to navigate the driveway.

Josh Lavine, representing the franchise, emphasized Wendy’s local roots and commitment to community involvement, portraying the project as a positive development for the area. The restaurant aims to serve as a community hub, offering affordable meals while beautifying the currently vacant lot. However, Ed Jallowick, a local resident, voiced skepticism, highlighting a disconnect between the business’s interests and the community’s needs. He argued that the proposed site was too small to accommodate the expected volume of traffic, referencing his experience in facilities management to underscore the potential for congestion and safety issues.

The board also considered the implications of increased traffic flow and safety at the Worcester Court intersection, which is known for frequent accidents. The addition of flashing stop signs was discussed as a potential measure to enhance driver awareness. A recent traffic study, which some stakeholders criticized for not capturing peak traffic times accurately, was cited in the discussion. The board acknowledged the need for a peer review of the traffic study, planning to review this at a future meeting.

The proposal also included modifications to the site’s landscape and drainage plans. Concerns about drainage design, particularly in light of recent heavy rainfall patterns, led to calls for systems capable of handling more significant storm events. The potential for flooding on Spring Bars Road was a particular concern.

While proponents of the Wendy’s project emphasized its benefits, local residents highlighted the potential downsides, particularly regarding traffic and pedestrian safety.

In addition to the Wendy’s proposal, the board unanimously approved a special permit for Michael and Kira Edwards to modify their non-conforming garage. The project, located on Sitters Pond Road, involves adding a second-floor loft and attached shed. The board found that the alterations complied with zoning bylaws and would not negatively impact the neighborhood. Kevin Clower, representing the Edwards, assured the board that the project would provide necessary storage and recreational space without introducing new non-conformities.

Procedural discussions during the meeting addressed the board’s composition, especially concerning quorum issues due to a member’s recusal. The board deliberated on voting procedures.

As the meeting concluded, the board reviewed several agenda items, including a previously approved 40B housing proposal that had undergone mediation. Adjustments to the project were made following an abutter’s claim of adverse possession, with the board approving these changes without opposition.