The primary focus of the meeting centered on the application from Thiago Rasalan to convert his single-family dwelling into two units on Old Barnstable Road. Rasalan’s proposal involved maintaining the existing structure’s size while increasing lot coverage within zoning limits. However, this application brought up several compliance issues, particularly regarding the property’s septic system and bedroom count.

Concerns were raised about the property’s existing septic system, described as outdated and in need of an upgrade. The zoning board noted that a five-bedroom septic permit was required, though it was unclear whether such a permit existed. A letter from the Board of Health also highlighted the need for a five-bedroom disposal permit.

Board member Tony Puchi pointed out previous actions by Rasalan that raised concerns, as the bylaws prohibit adding bedrooms or increasing square footage during conversions. Rasalan confirmed that the property originally had five bedrooms, with no changes planned post-conversion. However, public testimony contradicted this, with a neighbor named Diana asserting that the house had up to ten bedrooms. Diana recounted disturbances from the property, including noise, excessive cars, and potential fire hazards, emphasizing that the property should adhere to single-family zoning bylaws.

Another resident echoed these concerns, describing the nuisance caused by the property’s occupants, including noise and littering. This individual expressed frustration over the lack of respect shown by the property’s occupants, stating their right to a peaceful neighborhood should be upheld.

The board discussed the need for an inspection to verify the number of bedrooms and ensure adherence to zoning laws. They deliberated on possible conditions for the permit, such as limiting basement use and preventing additional kitchen installations. Parking and address signage requirements were also highlighted to ensure compliance with emergency access standards.

In another matter, the board addressed issues with property staking and compliance in applications for special permits. The board reviewed an application for a property on Silver Beach Avenue, which involved removing a garage and rebuilding a non-conforming dwelling. Concerns about the lack of proper property staking and surveyor practices led to a continuation of the hearing to allow the applicant time to rectify these issues.

Similarly, the application for a property on Alcott Street sought to convert a garage into habitable space while exceeding lot coverage limits. The board discussed fence encroachments and the need for stormwater and erosion control measures. Both applications faced scrutiny over inadequate staking and compliance with zoning requirements, prompting continuations to ensure proper adherence to regulations.

Additionally, the board engaged in a discussion about managing public comments during hearings. Concerns were raised about fairness in speaking times, with abutters often limited to two minutes while applicants received longer periods. The board considered implementing a sound notification system to alert speakers of time constraints. They also discussed the need for applicants to be concise and possibly submit written statements in advance to streamline proceedings.

The board acknowledged the challenges of balancing public input with maintaining meeting efficiency. Members highlighted the importance of transparency and structure in managing discussions.