The most notable discussion of the meeting centered on a variance request to create a smaller apartment unit on Central Avenue. The applicant, North Johnson, representing Farbo Downtown Central LLC, sought approval to allow an apartment to be reduced to no smaller than 368 square feet. The variance was part of a broader plan to subdivide the property into three parcels. The property, known as the Eastman’s building, has been home to several commercial tenants, including a dance studio and a tea shop.

City staff recommended approval of the variance, citing compliance with zoning regulations and the benefit of encouraging further investment in the historic downtown area. However, commissioners raised numerous questions about the specifics of the variance, particularly focusing on occupancy limits. One commissioner emphasized the importance of understanding the implications of the proposed changes, especially considering the building code requirements for such small units.

The topic of occupancy limits for micro apartments sparked considerable debate among the commissioners. While city staff recommended a two-person occupancy limit to align with building codes, opinions varied on whether this condition should be enforced. A commissioner voiced concern about ensuring consistency in decision-making, referencing previous requests for smaller apartments in the downtown area. The discussion acknowledged the growing demand for micro apartments, with one commissioner noting that these units are often the first to be rented due to their affordability and practicality.

In addition to the occupancy debate, another commissioner disclosed a potential conflict of interest, revealing an inherited share in Fairb Industrial Corporation, which had some involvement in the project. Despite this disclosure, the commissioner felt comfortable continuing to participate in the discussion.

After thorough deliberation, the commission voted on the motion to approve the variance without the occupancy condition, which passed with one dissenting vote.

Another focal point of the meeting was the broader implications of micro unit living on the local housing market. The commissioners considered the impact of such developments on future residents and the need for clear, consistent guidelines. The decision to approve the variance without the occupancy condition highlighted the shifting attitudes toward micro units and their role in addressing housing needs in the community.

Beyond the variance request, the meeting addressed other routine items, including updates on team business and board matters. Commissioners briefly reviewed attendance records, particularly for those nearing their limits.