The commission devoted significant time to reviewing its bylaws, specifically the language concerning meeting attendance. Members discussed the need to clarify what constitutes a regular meeting versus a regularly scheduled meeting. Concerns were raised about the current wording being confusing, especially as the commission frequently cancels meetings. The consensus was to consider changing the attendance policy to a percentage-based system rather than a fixed number, to accommodate the varying number of meetings held each year.

Conflict of interest protocols were another focal point. Members were reminded that if they have a potential conflict, they should disclose it early and recuse themselves from related discussions and decisions. This is to maintain transparency and integrity within the commission’s proceedings.

Additionally, the commission reviewed general operational basics, including adherence to open meeting laws and the handling of gifts from developers, which are capped at $5. The procedures for handling data requests and the importance of not retaining personal notes from meetings were highlighted.