The new cell phone policy, which prohibits cell phone use during school hours, generated debate among board members. One board member highlighted the policy’s potential to drastically shift student behavior, acknowledging the challenges it may pose for enforcement. Another member expressed optimism about the policy, viewing it as a necessary starting point despite its flaws, emphasizing the need for administrative support in its implementation. The policy aims to create a “cell phone-free zone,” aligning with existing practices at the elementary and middle school levels, and now extending to the high school with specific provisions for usage before and after school and during lunch periods.

However, a board member raised concerns about allowing cell phone use during lunch. This amendment failed in a tie vote, leading to the approval of the original policy with a 5-1 majority. The policy will be communicated to students and parents through the student handbook and announcements by the principal during the initial days of school, with further emphasis during an upcoming open house.

The board also tackled Policy 418, which pertains to a drug-free workplace and school environment. An amendment focusing on parental notification when students are caught with drugs or alcohol, especially those under 18, was a point of discussion. Concerns were raised about the rights of students aged 18 and older and the potential legal ramifications of the policy change. The board recognized the need to balance legal requirements with community values and the interests of both students and parents. After a detailed examination, the policy was amended and passed with a roll call vote.

Policy 524, which deals with internet technology and cell phone acceptable use, was another major topic. An amendment was proposed to include “parental guardian consent if necessary to complete an assignment,” emphasizing the importance of parental awareness. The amendment failed in a 4-2 vote, and the original policy was subsequently approved. Discussions highlighted the complexities of managing various devices while maintaining a conducive learning environment, with concerns about liability for lost or damaged items once confiscated.

The board also reviewed Policy 601 concerning school district curriculum and instructional goals. An amendment to include the term “whites” in discussions about racial disadvantage led to debate. One member questioned the necessity of addressing areas where white individuals may be disadvantaged. The amendment failed in a tie vote, and the original policy passed with a majority.

Miss Moore proposed an amendment to Policy 707, which addresses the transportation of homeless students. The amendment sought to clarify that living in a trailer park does not equate to being homeless. The motion was unanimously rejected, reinstating the original policy language.

The board approved the hiring of an additional kindergarten teacher at Roosevelt Elementary to maintain class sizes between 18 to 20 students.

The meeting also included discussions on the fiscal year 2024-2025 Ice Arena contract, with concerns about potential competition from Northfield’s new ice arena project. The board addressed the approval of an agreement with local number 70 Operating Engineers, noting a 3.5% increase in the first year.

A significant portion of the meeting focused on community engagement and adult education programs. The board discussed the success of an adult driver’s education program, which expanded participation from an initial goal of 25 people to 346. The program has become a state model, with nearly 350 adults participating in the previous year and a new grant of $15,000 from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety.