Firefighter Pay and Classification Overhaul Takes Center Stage at Hampden Board of Selectmen Meeting

The Hampden Board of Selectmen meeting focused on discussions surrounding the pay rates, classification, and budgetary concerns for the town’s fire department. The meeting addressed discrepancies in firefighter compensation, proposals for updating pay grades, and the need for a review of the town’s salary structures. The selectmen also tackled budget allocations for various town departments, debated the necessity of equipment purchases, and discussed upcoming projects and meetings.

18:32At the forefront of the meeting was the issue of firefighter pay rates and classifications. The board scrutinized the absence of a formal grading system for firefighters, which had resulted in arbitrary pay step assignments. The last salary study conducted in 2021 was deemed outdated, creating frustration among board members who sought accurate data for fair comparisons.

A notable proposal suggested classifying the firefighter supervisor as a grade five and regular firefighters as grade four. This suggestion aimed to recognize the additional responsibilities and experience of the supervisor while ensuring parity with other administrative assistants who are also classified as grade four. The board deliberated on how certification levels should affect pay, given that not all firefighters hold the same qualifications. The absence of union contracts for the fire department further complicated the compensation process compared to other town employees.

38:34In parallel, the board considered the implications of a proposed 2.5% increase in the reimbursement rate for call firefighters, which had been stagnant for several years. This increase was projected to add approximately $3,400 to the budget, deemed necessary to ensure fair compensation for volunteer services. Members acknowledged the unpredictability of call firefighter expenses and the complexities of mutual aid agreements, emphasizing the need for clarity in the classification system.

56:36The selectmen also addressed broader budgetary concerns, particularly regarding equipment for the highway and park departments. Article 17, which proposed funding for a new truck, was met with disapproval and subsequently removed from consideration. Article 18’s proposal for a new lawnmower was similarly questioned, with members highlighting the existing equipment’s functionality. The park department’s lack of formal budget submissions added to the uncertainty surrounding these requests.

0:00Attention shifted to the fire department’s budget, where inconsistencies between requested pay rates and those recommended by the Collins report were apparent. The selectmen were informed of discrepancies due to delayed implementation of the report’s recommendations, which impacted firefighter pay scales. The board expressed a commitment to addressing these issues within the budgetary process, emphasizing the importance of fair compensation while adhering to established guidelines.

1:13:44The meeting also featured discussions on infrastructure projects, including a bridge project with logistical complexities involving helicopters and pontoons. The board considered the feasibility of completing the project either in the fall or the following year. In addition, the potential combination of the Water District Clerk and Board of Health Coordinator roles was explored as a cost-saving measure, with discussions on the implications for work hours and budget savings.

38:34The board reviewed several other topics, such as the nomination of animal inspectors, the urgency of water testing compliance, and the need for improved communication on veterans exemption clauses.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: