The introduction of a new resident parking ordinance was one of the primary topics discussed. The ordinance affects multiple streets around the Union Square project, turning them into resident-only parking areas. Streets such as Spring Street, Bloomfield Avenue, Maple Avenue, William Street, and Court Street are now designated for residents, although potential amendments could allow businesses to access these areas after certain hours. The board discussed future plans for angled parking and parking meters, specifically to accommodate local businesses. Pending roadwork, contingent on weather conditions, adds another layer of complexity to the traffic and parking situation in the area.

The meeting also provided an update on the ambitious development of the Quota Road properties. A representative for the property owners discussed plans to subdivide three lots into 19 lots for constructing 18 townhouses. The plan has faced complications due to a pending access permit from the DOT, which has been in process since January. The board highlighted the necessity of understanding DOT requirements to ensure proposals align with what is permissible. Financial constraints have delayed the pursuit of a floodplain permit, as the representatives preferred to await certainty on the road opening permit before making further investments. The board expects an update by March, after the DOT’s anticipated response, to determine the project’s viability and potential for public hearings.

Another development discussed was the proposed cannabis retail center, “Bless Wellness,” on a property currently housing two banks. The project includes maintaining one bank and altering traffic circulation and landscaping. The plan calls for 28 parking spaces, more than the required 13 spaces due to the combined retail and banking use. However, concerns about traffic flow and compliance with previous recommendations were raised. The proposal to retain the central bank building was driven by impervious coverage regulations, as exceeding 70% would necessitate a variance which the applicant sought to avoid. The board emphasized the importance of balancing compliance with the need for site enhancements, particularly concerning pedestrian access and stormwater management.

Traffic and parking were recurring themes throughout the meeting, as the board reviewed various applications and their implications. The project’s compliance with local ordinances and the necessary variances for impervious coverage and signage were central to the discussions. For instance, a proposal for a property at the intersection of South Main Street and Route 12 sought relief from a 50% impervious coverage requirement. The proposal included landscaping modifications, such as the introduction of acer maple sugar trees, and a reevaluation of traffic circulation patterns.

The meeting also addressed the dynamics of site use changes, particularly in the Highway Retail (HR) zone. It was clarified that changes involving only interior modifications do not necessitate additional site plan approvals, although significant alterations like the removal of a drive-thru would require further review. The board considered various interpretations of zoning requirements, emphasizing the importance of clear guidelines to ensure compliance and community benefit.