A crucial aspect of the zoning overhaul involves transitioning from specific SIC codes to a more streamlined approach to permitted uses. This move is intended to foster a dynamic downtown atmosphere, encouraging retail services, health and fitness facilities, and entertainment options like theaters and breweries. The board emphasized that the changes aim to support a walkable and engaging downtown, reflecting community desires for revitalization.

Concerns arose about existing businesses and the grandfathering provisions that would allow them to continue operating under new zoning laws. The board clarified that current businesses would not be forced to relocate, but changes in ownership or use would require compliance with the new regulations. The conversation highlighted the need for these amendments as part of a longstanding goal to activate Main Street, a central theme in the master plan.

The discussion also touched on the potential for retail use in basements, which had been previously restricted. The new ordinance would permit such uses, provided they meet construction code requirements, expanding opportunities for business utilization. Additionally, the board considered the definition of “active uses” and their impact on downtown vibrancy. Businesses like barber shops and nail salons were highlighted as contributing to foot traffic, a vital component for a thriving downtown.

The board explored the implications of the proposed zoning changes on the DB2 district, particularly in relation to the Liberty Village redevelopment plan. The DB2 district serves as a transitional area between downtown and residential zones, emphasizing limited permitted uses to maintain harmony with neighboring residential areas. The revisions would allow specific uses, such as offices and retail sales, while excluding high-impact businesses like restaurants and breweries from certain locations.

Key debates centered on the alignment of the DB2 district with the Liberty Village plan, particularly regarding the introduction of restaurants and the potential impact on existing single-family homes. The board considered whether rezoning sections of the DB2 district, especially around Church Street, might better align with residential uses, given the predominance of single-family homes in the area.

The board also discussed the complexities of maintaining an accurate record of business statuses following the ordinance change, emphasizing the need for a formal process to track openings and closures. The introduction of a certificate of non-conforming use was proposed to protect businesses that existed before the ordinance change, allowing owners to document their status within a year of implementation.

The meeting concluded with a focus on the next steps for ordinance revisions, including a proposal for a subcommittee to meet with the zoning officer to refine the changes. The board planned to present the refined ordinance back to the planning board for additional feedback before potentially introducing it to the council. The importance of transparent communication with council members and the community was underscored.