A point of discussion was the proposal for Ordinance 25-22, which sought to amend the existing commercial plan development (CPD) for properties on School Street and Estero Boulevard to permit outdoor alcohol consumption. The ordinance proposed revising the schedule of uses to include this provision as an accessory to the hotel and restaurant. The applicant’s attorney clarified that the amendment was intended to correct a technical omission rather than change the project’s intensity or design. The proposal involved outdoor service on a dining patio and a rooftop pool area, with operating hours from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily.

Agency members expressed concerns about potential noise and disruptions to nearby residential areas. The applicant reassured the agency that the outdoor areas were designed to minimize disturbances and comply with separation distances from sensitive areas like schools and parks. The conversation touched on the importance of managing the balance between community standards and the operational needs of local businesses. There was also a debate about whether to restrict the pool area’s access to registered guests only, due to concerns about parking and potential overcrowding.

In addition to the discussions on alcohol consumption, the agency tackled a detailed review of impact fees. The proposed ordinance aimed to update the town’s impact fee structure based on a recent study. Key changes included reducing the number of impact fee categories and modifying the calculation method for single-family homes from a per-dwelling basis to a square footage range. The ordinance also sought to align fees with updated population data and anticipated project needs.

Participants highlighted the need for transparency and clarity in how impact fees are assessed. There was a proposal to implement a cost of living adjustment for fees, although the current approach involves a review every four years. The debate also addressed the timing of fee collection, emphasizing that fees are charged during the building permit and certificate of occupancy stages.

Concerns were raised about the impact of these fee adjustments on new developments. The agency clarified that the proposed changes would not result in higher fees for new developments, as increases would need to be justified by the proportional share of new development towards capital projects.

The meeting also touched on various other planning and development issues. The agency reviewed a variance request for a property on Estero Boulevard, focusing on outdoor consumption and gaming areas. Participants deliberated on the implications of co-mingling alcohol consumption with spaces designed for family activities. The proposal included serving beer and wine, with a focus on creating a family-friendly atmosphere where adults could supervise their children.