A focal point of the meeting was the debate over the fee structure associated with development agreements. The council examined various options, including flat rates, charges based on square footage, and comparisons with neighboring communities’ fees. The aim was to ensure fairness and consistency while considering potential cost savings and flexibility compared to the traditional CPD process. Council members discussed the potential use of third-party consultants to expedite the review process, weighing the impact on smaller developers. The decision was deferred, allowing staff more time to research and present thorough recommendations.

The council also deliberated on a special exception for a new restaurant with a visible bar in a residential neighborhood, particularly in the mixed-use Theater District. Concerns were raised about noise, music, and the intrusion into residential life. However, the applicant agreed to comply with conditions to mitigate the impact, leading to unanimous approval of the resolution with stipulated conditions.

Zoning issues were another significant topic, with the council addressing a potential rezoning request from a local business owner who sought to have retail tenants in a building currently zoned as Commercial Boulevard. Discussions touched on the shortage of retail space on the island, the need for basic services for residents, and the history and intent of the zoning code. The council debated the need for changes to allow for more retail options and the implications of expanding the Commercial Boulevard district.

Furthermore, the council considered the possibility of adding a Condo and Resort District to the comprehensive plan. This proposal raised questions about its potential impact on building height and density regulations. The current comprehensive plan restricts building heights, with exceptions for designated redevelopment areas. The council sought clarity on the implications of such a district and its effects on the island’s landscape.

The council also discussed the potential impact of FEMA’s recent determination on the National Flood Insurance Program CRS rating. The lack of official notice from FEMA was met with frustration, and the council detailed their extensive communications and efforts to resolve the issue. There was talk of potential legal action and a commitment to ensure compliance and clear communication with FEMA and the county.

Lighting ordinances, particularly concerning turtle-friendly policies and the Dark Skies initiative, were a point of contention. The council grappled with the enforcement and interpretation of these policies, calling for better education and clearer language in the ordinances.

In addition to these discussions, the council briefly mentioned the need for a strategic planning session and the potential addition of a staff member with relevant expertise. They also addressed agenda management and confirmed the next steps for a reconvened meeting to discuss specific resolutions and FEMA-related matters.