Lura Jackson from the CCCL program presented a detailed explanation of the application process for permits, highlighting the differences between individual and general permits and pointing out the tools available on the program’s website to assist applicants. There was a notable emphasis on the necessity for electronic submission of documents and the problems faced due to the increased volume of applications following the storm. This deluge has led to challenges in processing times and accuracy, with a suggested 90-day timeframe for issuing a permit upon receipt of a completed application being flagged.

The council meeting further discussed the importance of accurate property surveys, especially concerning the CCCL lines. There was a debate about the need for including CCCL lines on property surveys, taking into account the age of the survey and the requirement to reflect various coastal features. The need for recent surveys was defended by pointing to the necessity of accounting for erosion projections and other criteria, which are vital for building and rebuilding in coastal areas.

The need for detailed application descriptions came to the forefront, with a focus on the confusion surrounding the proper use of emergency applications, which are intended only for minor repairs and not for major construction projects. The misuse of these applications has contributed to the backlog and confusion in the approval process. Additionally, the discussion emphasized the need for clear identification of the owner and agent on the application to streamline the process.

As the council moved on to specific construction requirements, the challenges of obtaining approval for lighting plans became apparent, particularly for properties close to marine turtle nesting habitats. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s timeline for lighting plan approvals was a cause for concern, potentially delaying the permitting process.

The application process for structures with proposed permanent exterior lighting was another topic, with the discussion pivoting to the importance of accurate grading plans and the use of beach-compatible material for fill requirements. The conversation shed light on the application process for a general permit, stressing the need for compliance with specific requirements, especially for structures located seaward of the control line.

A point addressed was the quick turnaround time and reduced fees for applications that fall within the 62b34 process zone. Furthermore, the council clarified the types of activities permissible with a field permit, such as minor structures and dune walkovers, and the restrictions on activities like lighting and excavation. The discussion also touched on the responsibilities for restoring dune systems impacted by hurricanes, emphasizing the importance of adhering to existing dune restoration projects and control lines.