The primary focus was on designing a water taxi service that could alleviate traffic congestion for residents, tourists, and snowbirds without compromising the back bay’s ecosystem. A draft proposal from Chris King of the Anchorage Advisory Committee was presented for review, with plans for a dual meeting in May to further explore the initiative. Several operational structures were debated, including licensing operators in a manner akin to Uber drivers, which would allow for on-demand pickups. However, concerns arose about the potential for operators to prioritize trip frequency over safety, leading to speeding issues. To counter this, some members advocated for a fixed point-to-point service model to ensure manageability and efficiency.

Logistical aspects such as service stops were also scrutinized. The members considered limiting drop-off points. Comparisons were made to the existing open-air trolley system, with a preference for scheduled stops over random pickups to avoid logistical complications. The distinction between a water taxi and a water ferry was clarified, with the former seen as a ride-hailing service and the latter as a leisure transport for larger groups, possibly including on-board refreshments during peak tourist seasons.

The feasibility of private companies running the service was questioned, noting that previous private water taxi efforts struggled. The task force highlighted the necessity of a reliable schedule and sufficient vessels to meet demand, while ensuring no increase in reckless behavior from operators. Ideas for an “Uber-type” system with licensed captains were tabled, but doubts about its practicality without infrastructure improvements were voiced. The task force recognized the need for regulations to prevent a “wild wild west” scenario.

The conversation touched on the environmental impact of increased boat traffic, stressing the importance of not overwhelming the local ecosystem. Members proposed that each participant identify two needs and two wants for the next meeting to guide discussions effectively. Concerns about the town’s potential liability if endorsing specific businesses were raised, leading to a consensus that while a list of licensed contractors could be provided, outright endorsements should be avoided.

Regulatory discussions extended to helicopter operations and their impact on local wildlife. Members debated the jurisdiction and regulatory obligations of such businesses, especially those operating from private docks. The complexities of whether additional permits were required for businesses providing transportation to helipads were acknowledged. It was suggested that regulatory agencies be made aware of community concerns.

Aside from transportation topics, the task force explored environmental initiatives, including an oyster gardening program with local water keepers. The ecological role of oysters as filter feeders was highlighted, with ideas for community involvement in oyster reef growth under docks. The potential collaboration with local businesses, such as oyster bars, was discussed to facilitate this initiative.

Littering, particularly from fake flower petals at beach weddings, was another concern. Participants reported an increase in plastic petals at local parks, posing risks to wildlife. An ordinance banning these items was proposed, drawing parallels to existing regulations against litter. The task force suggested amending current ordinances and ensuring beach patrols monitor weddings to enforce compliance.

Waste management issues, including stormwater drain litter, were addressed, with proposals to install trash-collecting nets and improve filtration systems. The need for collaboration with public works and potential funding for canal dredging projects through partnerships with entities like the Army Corps of Engineers was noted.