The discussion about CRAs included explanations of their function as specialized taxing districts that capture property tax revenue within their boundaries to fund redevelopment. The potential benefits for the Town Square and downtown district were highlighted, with emphasis on keeping generated funds local rather than reverting them to the county. However, the process would require county endorsement, and there was apprehension about investing resources in a proposal that might not gain approval. The council considered exploring alternative models used by nearby jurisdictions, such as Bonita Springs, to enhance the proposal’s chances of acceptance.

Amid these deliberations, a council member raised questions about the feasibility of hiring a consultant to assist with the CRA process, given past challenges with meeting deadlines. The idea of inviting a subject matter expert to a subsequent meeting was proposed to ensure the council fully understood the CRA’s implications. Additionally, there were suggestions to seek insights from other cities on their experiences with CRAs and to explore the possibility of engaging a different consultant or enlisting support from the city of Fort Myers for guidance.

Another focal point of the meeting was a proposed ordinance concerning the payment of fees and charges before the issuance of permits. This ordinance, initially considered by the Local Planning Agency (LPA), aimed to amend the Land Development Code to ensure all fees owed to the town are settled before processing applications or permits. The discussion revolved around the types of indebtedness this ordinance should cover, ranging from minor infractions like parking tickets to more substantial issues such as code enforcement liens. Concerns were expressed about the potential legal ramifications of this requirement and the importance of defining the scope of applicable debts clearly. The council sought a balance between enforcing financial responsibility and ensuring residents could access necessary permits for their projects.

In conjunction with the permit discussion, the council addressed the process of notifying residents about development applications. Suggestions included transferring the responsibility of mailing notifications from town staff to applicants, reducing administrative burdens. This proposal was seen as a means to enhance accountability, although concerns about disputes arising from missed notifications were acknowledged. The possibility of requiring certified mail for notifications was debated, with mixed opinions on its effectiveness and cost implications. The council emphasized the importance of transparent processes and community engagement, striving to maintain open lines of communication with residents.

The meeting also addressed the topic of temporary housing, specifically the extension of permits for recreational vehicles (RVs) or trailers used as temporary residences post-storm. The original three-year mark set by a state statute was intended to align with state decisions. Discussions highlighted the challenges in verifying residency in these temporary structures and the need for data on active permits and occupancy status to make informed decisions. The council recognized the frustration among residents regarding their uncertain housing situation and stressed the importance of communicating a clear deadline to incentivize rebuilding efforts.