The discussion about student test scores dominated the meeting, with a particular focus on the science unit results. Board members expressed concern over the significant drop in student performance in science units three and four, compared to adequate performance in units one and two. This decline was attributed to student fatigue and disengagement towards the end of the testing period. To address this, the administrative team is planning to revisit the testing schedule in January.

In response to the identified fatigue issue, strategies were discussed to build student stamina for longer tests, which can last up to 90 minutes. Suggestions included gradually increasing the time students spend on classroom tasks, starting with 15 minutes and working up to longer durations. This approach aims to improve their focus and ability to complete assessments without rushing. Collaborative interdisciplinary team meetings, involving teachers from ELA, math, science, and social studies, were highlighted as essential for supporting vertical articulation across grade levels and ensuring a unified approach to teaching.

The board also reviewed performance data from platforms such as MobyMax and EXL, emphasizing the need for teachers to understand the progression of standards across subjects. There was a particular focus on vertical articulation in math, especially between seventh and tenth grades, to help students develop foundational skills necessary for tackling more complex problems. The continuation of the summer enrichment program and small group instruction through Response to Intervention (RTI) was also discussed as part of the strategy to address learning gaps.

Concerns were raised over the new staff members’ adjustment to curricula changes, which might have contributed to the dips in student performance. The expectation is that scores will improve as teachers become more accustomed to the new material. The board recognized the need to strive for higher achievement levels beyond the state average, particularly in science, where proficiency rates were notably low.

Another point of discussion focused on the impact of technology on learning, with some board members advocating for a return to paper-based testing. They argued that the introduction of computers has led to a lack of engagement in reading and comprehension among students. It was highlighted that the state allows for paper testing, and this method could offer better insights into student learning compared to computer-based assessments.

The meeting also touched on broader issues related to educational strategies and the impact of the pandemic on foundational skills, particularly for students who experienced disrupted education during their kindergarten years. This has affected their attitudes towards effort and achievement, creating challenges that educators must address.

The conversation about standardized testing extended to the need for a shift in mindset towards assessments. Negative attitudes towards testing were seen as influencing student perceptions and performance, with an emphasis on the importance of viewing assessments as valuable data sources for identifying weaknesses and targeting instruction.

In addition to academic discussions, the meeting covered plans for community engagement initiatives. The revival of Community Day in celebration of the 75th anniversary of Frankford Township School was announced, featuring activities such as food trucks, local vendors, and possibly an Atlantic Health helicopter landing. The board also discussed the upcoming Veterans Day ceremony and Halloween festivities, emphasizing the importance of community involvement in school events.

Facilities and budget updates were provided, including the anticipated demolition of the TCU during the November break and ongoing issues with a roofing project. The board noted challenges with the contractor’s responsiveness, delaying project completion and warranty issuance.

Public comments reflected frustrations with the current educational climate, parents’ involvement, and the effectiveness of state mandates. A call was made for reevaluating these mandates, citing concerns about their impact on district operations and the need for local governance flexibility.