The application that garnered considerable attention was the McDonald’s building’s architectural alteration. The plan involves replacing the existing double slope roof with a single slope mansard roof and removing the iconic French fry lights. Despite some expressed sentiment over the loss of the building’s character, the committee gave the green light to the project after discussing the shingle color choice and type.

Another project discussed was the construction of a new multi-purpose building on a local school property. The committee examined the plans for this new addition, which includes a multi-purpose room, classroom space for special programs, and admissions space. The proposed building is set to be built adjacent to an existing music building and will feature upper and lower courtyards and a sidewalk connection. The representation assured that there would be no increase in faculty, students, or trip generation. Committee members delved into the project’s specifics, raising questions about the building’s design, its exterior materials, and the potential impact on the surrounding landscape. Concerns were voiced regarding the visibility from the canal and the overall scale of the building, leading to a request for more information and a promise of further review before final approval.

The meeting also tackled discussions about sustainable elements for the proposed school building. The committee debated the use of materials such as storm traps and the pursuit of LEED certification to reduce the building’s environmental impact. There was a particular focus on the landscaping plan, which included the placement of trees and the need for a planting plan. The orientation of the building sparked debate, with some members advocating for a more traditional approach while others defended the contemporary design. The plan is to submit an application to the planning board with a commitment to addressing the various concerns raised during the discussion.

Another topic of interest was the renovation of a building at a local school, which included a need for a more developed roof plan, landscaping plan, and an elevation study from East Avenue. The committee discussed the necessity of a tree survey and the consideration of adding Evergreen trees to soften the landscape. The applicant’s request to replace a demolished chimney with a faux chimney also came up for review. The committee discussed the historical significance of the building and the proposed materials for the faux chimney.

Additionally, the meeting addressed the possibility of a cannabis store and maintenance issues such as the reconstruction of a chimney and the rebuilding of a front walkway retaining wall to mitigate a tripping hazard. The property diversion plan for the dun house was reviewed, which involves transferring oversight to the New Jersey Historic Trust, and a suggestion for a site visit was made.

In a nod to environmental concerns and efficiency, the committee also discussed reducing paper usage by transitioning to digital documents and iPads for meeting materials.

The aforementioned applications for repair and replacement works at residential properties were approved with little discussion. These included the repair and replacement of a deck and railings on East Avenue, as well as the replacement of windows and a roof over the windows on Route 27.