The proposed apartment complex became a focal point due to its scale and the environmental implications it carries. The commission members expressed apprehension regarding the removal and replacement of trees, the absence of larger three-bedroom affordable apartments, and the subsequent effects on the school system. The proximity of a McDonald’s restaurant to the site, coupled with a history of automotive activities in the area, underscored the need for careful monitoring during development. Furthermore, the commission highlighted the importance of sustainable practices by recommending the integration of anti-idling signage, bike storage, buffering, pervious pavement, rain gardens, green roofs, and solar technology into the project. The dialogue also encompassed the optimal number and distribution of electric vehicle charging stations, as well as the implementation of ground source heat pumps for heating within the development.

Another point of discussion was a legal notification for a flood hazard area verification for a land parcel, which spurred an extensive conversation about the property’s potential development. Additional deliberations involved a parcel on Route 27 in Somerset, which was suggested for consideration as open space due to its strategic location near the Six Mile Run and township-owned land.

The commission also reviewed plans for other properties, such as those on Liberty Lane and near an SGS site. The detailed exchanges among members regarding these properties revealed their intention to carefully consider the potential environmental and community impacts of each development project.

In terms of long-term goals, one member proposed exploring a real estate transfer tax to fund sustainability initiatives. The commission also evaluated the feasibility of conducting a waste audit at the Franklin Township Municipal Building. Despite concerns about the practicality of the project and the current lack of commercial recycling facilities in the township, there was also a suggestion to explore the county’s potential role in handling commercial recycling.

The recycling center’s operations were scrutinized as well, with the commission recognizing the need for an audit to ensure the proper separation of recyclables from regular waste. The disposal of paper materials and plans was also debated, alongside the ecological benefits of encouraging residents to leave fallen leaves on their lawns.

Additionally, the commission’s agenda included discussions on a micro-mobility study, focus tree plantings, sustainability and resiliency plan, and open space plan. The possibility of commission membership on the Municipal Advisory Committee was considered, with some members expressing interest in attending its inaugural virtual meeting.

The commission contemplated collaboration with the local youth center, recognizing the scheduling challenges posed by the students’ academic commitments and opting to revisit the initiative during the summer. The logistics of screening the environmental documentary “Kiss the Ground” were also examined, including the film’s duration, promotional strategies, venue selection, and partnership opportunities with the library.

Moreover, the commission proposed to promote the use of 100% recycled, unbleached toilet paper in an upcoming email blast and to encourage supermarkets to carry such products. The commission is also preparing for a stream clean-up event. The potential introduction of a new logo for the commission was discussed, with the idea of a community-involved design contest to enhance engagement and visibility.

Other ongoing projects mentioned included the community energy plan and the possibility of seeking implementation grants. The commission reviewed the progress of the annual report, which is scheduled to be presented to the council, and provided an update on the “adopt a drain” program, which includes a fee for service and the necessity for accurate reporting of drain cleaning activities.