The most contentious and discussion centered around the Milstone Valley Fire Department’s request to construct a pole barn on their Amo Road facility. The barn is needed to store rescue equipment, especially in light of recent safety concerns related to the adjacent canal. The commission raised concerns about the aesthetics of the proposed pre-fabricated metal structure. While the fire department emphasized practicality and operational needs, the commission debated the design’s compatibility with the existing firehouse and the overall character of East Milstone.

One commission member bluntly expressed skepticism regarding the design, likening it to a warehouse rather than a structure that would harmonize with the existing firehouse. This prompted a back-and-forth discussion about possible alternative designs and color choices. The representative for the fire department reiterated that the chosen gray and charcoal colors were intended to blend with the surrounding structures, but acknowledged that they might stand out more than anticipated. Suggestions were made to use barn-like colors or facades to better integrate the new building with its environment.

The debate also included technical considerations such as the building’s visibility and design elements. A suggestion was made to pull the addition back to make it feel more like an accessory building and rotate the doors, although concerns were raised about vehicle maneuverability. The existing site posed challenges due to poor soil conditions and restrictions from the canal commission, complicating stormwater management solutions. The commission ultimately decided to delay their decision, allowing time for further analysis of the costs and feasibility of potential revisions.

In another significant agenda item, representatives from the Kingston Presbyterian Church proposed an addition to address water infiltration and accessibility issues with their back entrance. The architect presented a design featuring a clear glass enclosure to maintain the visibility of the church’s main structure. The addition included heated slate flooring to handle winter weather conditions.

The committee appreciated the design and the architect’s attention to maintaining the historical integrity of the church, despite a minor error in the project documentation regarding the church’s location.

Another residential project on Route 27 was introduced, focusing on restoring a historic house that had been covered in aluminum and vinyl siding. The plan involved removing the existing siding to reveal the original clapboard structure and replacing it with cementitious siding that mirrored the original. The architect highlighted the importance of preserving historical aspects like dental moldings and maintaining the character of the building.

The project also included restoring the front facade and porch area with blue stone and integrating a “Yankee gutter” system. The discussion revealed concerns about the structural integrity of the building, as significant repairs were needed due to rot and decay. The committee engaged with the architect and property owner, raising questions about the gravel parking area and the long-term vision for the property, which aimed to complement the owner’s landscaping business.

The final major topic of the meeting was another residential restoration project focusing on maintaining original architectural elements while updating the building for modern use. The architect presented plans to preserve the original wood front doors and transom, replace windows with simulated divided lights, and use Hardy cement fiber siding. Discussions included the appropriate color for downspouts and the restoration of brackets and dentils. The committee emphasized the importance of obtaining necessary permits and maintaining the historical significance of the house.