The proposed chicken ordinance aims to provide clarity to residents who currently keep chickens, often in violation of existing laws that categorize them under livestock meant for commercial farming. As it stands, if a neighbor complains, residents are required to remove their chickens. The new ordinance would permit residents with 0.5-acre lots to keep up to six chickens, with the number increasing by two for every additional half-acre. This proposal has sparked debate, particularly around the inclusion of roosters and the required setbacks from property lines and residential structures. Some support allowing a single rooster, while others raise concerns about noise disturbances, particularly during early morning hours. The ordinance also includes provisions to manage odors and requires waste to adhere to state and local health regulations, with potential inspections following complaints.

Beyond the chicken ordinance, the committee addressed several issues impacting local open spaces and historic properties. A significant portion of the meeting focused on the financial and maintenance challenges faced by The Meadows Foundation, which manages several historic houses. The foundation has struggled with utility payments for properties like the Van L. Sudam and Van Wickle houses, leading to discussions about using the Open Space Trust Fund to cover these costs. The committee considered recommending that the town council permanently allocate funds for these utilities, although some members advocated for an annual review to ensure fiscal responsibility.

Concerns over inefficient heating systems and aging infrastructure were raised, with suggestions to explore alternate fuel vendors to reduce costs. Members noted potential savings by switching providers, highlighting the need for a review of contracts and heating strategies for unoccupied properties. Discussions also touched on the challenges of maintaining these historic properties, with issues such as outdated septic systems, chimney repairs, and water contamination requiring immediate attention.

The committee also examined various maintenance needs across several properties, including the restoration of the Van L. Sudam and Hagman houses. Restoration grants are set to begin for the Van L. Sudam house, but issues like uncollected brush piles and outdated HVAC equipment remain. The Hagman house requires septic system inspection due to frequent fill-ups and a bird infestation in the barn that necessitates professional cleaning.

Attention was given to the management of open spaces, with residents raising concerns about the Department of Public Works’ handling of property maintenance. Issues like the spread of noxious weeds on Board of Education property and the damage to personal projects like blueberry boxes were brought to the committee’s attention, highlighting the need for better coordination and communication with the DPW.

In addition to these concerns, the committee discussed various initiatives to enhance community engagement with local trails. Plans to promote trails through profiles and photo contests were shared, as well as efforts to create accessible trails for individuals with disabilities. Upcoming events, including hikes and partnerships with local organizations, were highlighted as part of these community engagement efforts.