0:05The most pressing topic was the board’s review of the Franklin Development Group’s application to construct two warehouse buildings totaling 150,000 square feet. The application, identified by the code PLN 25001, was under scrutiny due to its previous involvement in litigation. The court order emphasized the necessity for an accelerated review process. The applicant’s representative, Doug Wolfson, confirmed adherence to zoning regulations, with no variances requested, and outlined plans to address concerns raised by the board’s engineer and planner through expert testimony.

16:51Key discussions involved compliance with engineering recommendations, particularly regarding site access and buffering requirements due to the classification of a nearby stream as a C1 stream, demanding a 300-foot buffer. Emergency access was a focus, with considerations on whether its routing through the OP zone required a D variance. However, it was argued that emergency access should not trigger such a variance as it does not constitute a primary use of the zone. Suggestions for controlling access to emergency vehicles only were made to ensure public safety.

33:19The board also discussed the implications of traffic patterns and site access, emphasizing the need for compliant pedestrian pathways without triggering additional variances. Concerns were raised about the visual impact of the development, with recommendations for enhanced landscaping and screening along Route 27 to mitigate this. The applicant was willing to collaborate with township professionals to determine appropriate tree species for landscaping and to explore options for maintaining natural buffers.

0:05Simultaneously, the board deliberated on amendments to the bylaws concerning applicant notifications. The proposed changes came in response to issues arising from multiple postponements of hearings, which had resulted in public confusion. The amendments suggested mandatory re-noticing by applicants if a hearing is postponed more than once, to keep the public adequately informed. The need for balance was emphasized to avoid imposing excessive financial burdens on smaller applicants, with potential clauses for discretion based on application type and scale.

33:19Environmental impact was another focal point, with the board reviewing compliance with stormwater management requirements and the preservation of existing trees. Discussions included the need for a flood hazard permit and the use of vegetated swales, although these would not qualify as green infrastructure under New Jersey’s standards. The board stressed the importance of preserving natural resources while ensuring the site’s aesthetic appeal and functionality.

1:07:50The meeting also touched upon the potential incorporation of bike infrastructure and pedestrian pathways to facilitate access to nearby businesses.