The fire department seeks to construct a pole barn on its property to house rescue boats and other equipment. The proposed structure, a pre-fabricated metal building, would be 2,884 square feet in size. Approval from the Delaware Canal Commission was secured, but the fire department still needs local approval. The committee’s primary concern revolved around the building’s design, which was viewed as incongruous with the classic firehouse nearby. A commission member pointed out that alternative locations and designs had been considered, but the current site was chosen for practical reasons related to emergency vehicle access.

The fire department representatives highlighted the necessity of the project for community safety and expressed willingness to adjust the building’s appearance to better blend with its surroundings. They suggested altering the color from bright red to a more muted shade to lessen its visual impact. Discussions included the possibility of using lighter colors to help the building recede into the background, as darker hues might make it stand out more. The commission emphasized the importance of preserving the historical significance of the location, not just the visual impact on the canal.

A point of debate was the location of the stormwater management system. The committee had explored various options, including underground systems, but faced complications due to unsuitable soils. Shifting the building back to make it feel like an accessory structure was also considered, but concerns about adequate space for maneuvering fire apparatus and maintaining traffic flow on ML Road, a major thoroughfare, were raised.

Financial implications of potential changes, such as adding a brick veneer or shifting the building, were also discussed. The committee acknowledged budget limitations and explored synthetic materials as cost-effective facade options. Landscaping was suggested as an alternative to block the building from view, though skepticism was expressed regarding the reliability of landscaping due to maintenance issues.

The procedural aspects of the project involved collaboration with the planning board and the canal commission. Participants expressed a desire to explore revisions before committing to a vote on the building plans. The committee decided to postpone the decision to allow for a thorough evaluation of the proposals.

The meeting then addressed a project presented by the Kingsman Presbyterian Church, which aimed to resolve issues with the church’s rear entrance. Problems related to moisture infiltration and inadequate coverage were discussed, with a focus on ensuring the solution would not be visible from public view. There was consensus on the necessity of the project, given the practical issues with the current design.

Attention also turned to a residential restoration project on Route 27. The architect plans to remove deteriorating clapboard and replace it with new cementitious siding, restore windows with a four-over-four style, and preserve decorative elements like dental moldings. The project faced scrutiny due to a violation for commencing work without required approvals. The committee stressed the need for compliance with local zoning laws and necessary permits before proceeding.

Further discussion centered on a renovation project on East Avenue. The administrator emphasized the importance of the center and outlined updates to the roof, plumbing, and interiors. A critical point of contention was the permits for exterior modifications, as the building is located in a historic district. The committee emphasized compliance with local regulations, particularly concerning the historic nature of the building and surrounding area.

The meeting concluded with plans for reviewing resubmission packages that included detailed drawings and specifications related to the renovations. The committee expressed general agreement on the project’s direction, emphasizing the importance of following proper channels to ensure alignment with historical preservation standards. The administrator expressed gratitude for the committee’s support and collaboration.