The meeting began with the council’s consideration of an application by Citywide Holdings LLC, represented by attorney Ben Zerkis. The company sought a variance for two lots on Kohl’s Mill Road, each with a proposed frontage of 99 feet, one foot less than the required 100 feet. Zerkis argued that the proposed development aligned with the neighborhood’s character, as many surrounding properties also have 99-foot frontages. Engineer Kyle Denny testified, supporting the variance request and emphasizing that acquiring additional land for the required frontage would negatively impact adjacent properties. Denny noted that the lots meet all other necessary development criteria, including setbacks and environmental regulations, underscoring that 83% of the street’s lots have similar frontage, which supports the variance request.

Public commentary revealed mixed opinions, with resident Candace Coburn voicing strong concerns. She argued that approving the variance could set a worrisome precedent for the area, citing the potential for increased density and inadequate parking. Coburn questioned whether the proposed homes would have sufficient space for wells and septic systems, given the reduced lot size. Additional concerns were raised about the impact of construction activities on neighboring properties, specifically regarding vehicles parking on private land and damaging a neighbor’s sprinkler system.

Despite these concerns, the council proceeded with a motion to approve the application for the two homes, ultimately passing it unanimously. The decision hinged on the assertion that the development would integrate well with the existing neighborhood due to its consistent lot size with surrounding properties.

Following the approval of Citywide Holdings’ application, the council turned its attention to another variance request from resident Steven Cox. Cox sought approval to build a private garage exceeding the township’s standard size limitations. He explained his intention to construct a 40 by 55-foot garage, which required variances for both its area and height, as it would surpass the township’s maximum of 1,200 square feet and stand 19 feet 6 inches tall. Cox assured the council that the garage would be for personal use, housing a truck and a boat, and not for commercial purposes.

The council discussed the application, focusing on zoning regulations for accessory structures and their appropriate sizes relative to principal dwellings. After a brief public comment period, the council approved the variance request, noting that the garage’s location would prevent it from being visible from the road, thus minimizing its impact on the neighborhood’s aesthetics. The decision was made with unanimous support from the council members present.

As the meeting drew to a close, a resolution was presented and swiftly approved, confirming that all necessary points had been addressed during the discussions. The session concluded with a motion to adjourn, which was supported by all attendees.