The primary focus of the meeting was the application concerning Block 3908, where the applicant sought to redivide the property into four lots, with a request for a variance on one of the lots due to its nonconforming minimum lot area. The proposed development, while reducing the number of nonconforming lots, required discussion due to its implications for local zoning and infrastructure.

The proposal faced scrutiny over a key zoning variance, as one of the proposed lots measures only 17,196 square feet, falling short of the township’s 30,000 square foot requirement. The project aimed to improve the existing situation by consolidating nonconforming lots, a factor that the applicant’s attorney argued would ultimately benefit the community by enhancing the neighborhood’s residential capacity.

Central to the discussion was the drainage system associated with the proposed subdivision. The board deliberated on the responsibilities tied to a drainage easement, originally established in the 1960s. The conversation revealed uncertainties about the easement’s ownership and maintenance, with board members emphasizing the need for further investigation and potential state review if any modifications to the drainage system were pursued. The applicant was urged to coordinate with township professionals to clarify these responsibilities and ensure compliance with stormwater management regulations.

The drainage concerns were compounded by the proposed subdivision’s impact on stormwater infrastructure, particularly regarding two existing concrete pipes and a drain structure. The board highlighted the importance of ensuring that any changes to the drainage system would not adversely affect stormwater management, with suggestions that future development be contingent upon necessary approvals.

Additionally, the board examined the implications of a proposed 30-foot right-of-way, questioning its basis and suggesting its removal to avoid future ownership and responsibility confusion. The board expressed a preference for addressing easement issues in future applications rather than accepting the current plan as presented.

Lot size was another issue discussed, particularly for the proposed lot one, which was smaller than required. The board examined the feasibility of building on this lot, raising concerns about the potential for septic and well systems given its dimensions. Questions were raised about whether attempts had been made to acquire additional land to achieve conformity, with the consensus that it was impractical due to existing developments on adjacent properties.

The board’s deliberations were followed by public comments, where community members were invited to provide input on the proposed development. After considering these comments, a motion was made to approve the subdivision with conditions, including revising the plan to address drainage easement concerns and removing the 30-foot right-of-way designation. The resolution passed unanimously, with the board emphasizing the need for ongoing collaboration between the applicant and township professionals to refine the plans according to engineering feedback.

The meeting concluded with the board addressing administrative matters, including a brief review of previous meeting minutes and confirmation that no action was needed on those minutes since the July meeting had been canceled. With no additional business or need for closed sessions, the meeting adjourned following a unanimous vote.