0:00The proposal, presented by representatives of Garden State Harvesters, involved converting the old school building into a cannabis cultivation facility with advanced odor control systems designed to neutralize any unpleasant smells. Despite assurances from the applicant that operations would be conducted indoors with minimal environmental impact, the board and public voiced concerns, particularly regarding the site’s location directly across from a nursery school that serves 123 children.

2:05:21Community members expressed fears about the potential odor from the facility, especially during the flowering phase of cannabis plants, which could disrupt not only the daycare operations but also the lives of nearby residents. Additionally, concerns were raised about the facility’s impact on property values and the character of the neighborhood. One resident articulated the sentiment of many, stating, “I would just say not in my backyard,” emphasizing the unsuitable nature of a cannabis facility so close to residential homes and schools.

The board members noted their reservations about granting a variance outside of an industrial zone, particularly given the township’s existing ordinance framework. One member highlighted personal ties to the nearby daycare, stating, “two of my children and four of my grandchildren went to that nursery school.” These personal connections further solidified the board’s stance against the facility, with another member asserting, “I think we put in place certain things that should be followed, and this is one of them.”

0:00The discussion also centered around the broader implications of introducing cannabis facilities into residential agricultural zones. Concerns about security, noise, and light pollution were raised, alongside apprehensions about compliance with state regulations regarding cannabis operations. The applicant’s representative attempted to reassure the board by detailing the proposed facility’s security measures and adherence to state requirements, including a cloud-based surveillance system accessible to law enforcement and a closed-loop odor mitigation system.

2:05:21Despite these reassurances, the board members remained unconvinced, ultimately voting unanimously to reject the application. Their decision was influenced by the overwhelming public opposition and the potential negative effects on community institutions like the nearby daycare. The denial echoed sentiments of maintaining community standards and adhering to zoning regulations designed to protect residential areas from industrial-type developments.

Following the decision on the cannabis facility, the board addressed other matters, including the approval of a resolution for constructing additions to a single-family home. Conversely, an application from Mystic Bical Forms LLC was denied due to insufficient votes.