The meeting’s foremost topic was the application ZB25-03, submitted by Mr. Dillard, concerning a structure on his property on Stephan Drive. There was extensive discussion over whether this “New York shed” or “pool house” qualified as a permitted use under existing zoning regulations. Dillard’s representative argued that the structure, being an accessory use, should not require a use variance. However, issues arose due to the structure’s non-compliance with setback requirements, being only 4.9 feet from the side yard and 33 feet from the rear yard, against the required 20 feet and 50 feet, respectively. The board’s engineer expressed concern over the lack of prior permits for the construction, though Mr. Dillard noted permits had been obtained for other structures. The discussion included the property’s shipping container, used for tools.

Another discussion revolved around application ZB25-10, involving Jeremy Alyssa Light, represented by attorney Nathan Benjamin. This application was essentially a “forgiveness” request for unauthorized modifications to a property, which included the addition of two one-bedroom mother-in-law apartments without proper permits. Lightmire, the current owner, sought to secure a variance to legitimize these units while pledging not to use the property for commercial rentals. The board scrutinized the number of bedrooms and septic system adequacy, which required county approval. Concerns were raised about defining “family” for occupancy purposes, with suggestions to refine language to ensure only immediate family members could reside in the units.

Another notable application was ZB25-16, concerning lots owned by Neil Fosian. The proposal aimed to reconfigure lot lines to increase the size of a lot facing Morris Avenue, addressing its undersized status under zoning regulations. The lots were undersized compared to the 1.5-acre requirement, necessitating a use variance, as the area is designated as commercial, yet the intended use is residential. The discussion touched upon a vacated Pico Street, affecting property configurations, and public comments raised concerns about potential flooding from proposed adjustments. The board clarified that the current application focused on lot readjustment, with future developments needing to manage stormwater appropriately.