The proposed amendments to the ADU regulations dominated the meeting, as new state guidelines necessitated the revision of Freetown’s existing bylaws. The board explored the creation of a sample bylaw to replace current regulations. Discussion centered around allowing ADUs by right, as long as they meet specified criteria, which would streamline the process for residents looking to add these units to their properties.

A significant part of the discourse involved parking requirements and maintaining the single-family character of neighborhoods. The board emphasized the importance of integrating ADUs without disrupting the community’s residential nature. The conversation extended to whether independent utilities should be mandated for ADUs, especially those intended for family members, such as in-law units. Concerns about septic system upgrades for potential ADU conversions also emerged. It was noted that creating an apartment from a garage might not require a septic upgrade if a bedroom from the main house is relinquished. This raised further questions about the town’s regulations and their effect on facilitating or hindering such transformations.

The meeting also addressed long-standing property issues, particularly a property stagnant for over twenty years. The board acknowledged the planning board’s responsibility to investigate these properties and the potential impact on the community. The discussion suggested a need for proactive measures to resolve these enduring issues to prevent any adverse effects on the town’s financial obligations.

Another topic was the approval of the definitive subdivision for a property on Walnut Street, despite vocal public opposition. Michael and Aon Bish presented the subdivision plan, with Robert Perui of Mount Hope Engineering addressing prior concerns about fill and grading. A resident voiced strong dissatisfaction with the road placement, which would be only a foot from their property line, expressing concerns about potential damage to trees. The board clarified that their bylaws did not require a ten-foot setback and placed the responsibility for any damage on homeowners, advising the resident to consult a land attorney.

The board ultimately approved the subdivision, noting that the lots conformed to established standards. This decision came after a motion to close the public meeting, with no further comments from the board.

In addition to these discussions, the board also reviewed the town’s master plan draft. Members were encouraged to examine the document and provide feedback at an upcoming committee meeting. The importance of the master plan as a guide for securing funding and grants was emphasized, with a deadline for necessary updates approaching due to funding constraints. A member noted the need to update visuals in the plan, mentioning the demolition of a notable red house, while the board generally agreed with the draft’s content.

As the meeting progressed, gratitude was expressed to a departing member, Nicole, for her contributions during her tenure. Interviews were scheduled to find a replacement, as well as an administrator for land use and a town planner. The board also discussed logistical details for future meetings, considering whether to hold them in person or via Zoom.

Lastly, concerns were raised about delayed meeting minutes, stressing the need for timely documentation to comply with regulations. The board aimed to ensure that a new appointee would address this backlog promptly. The meeting concluded with a unanimous motion to adjourn.