The central topic of discussion was the transfer station’s oversight responsibilities. Following the recent bifurcation of the Board of Selectmen and Board of Health, there was a need to clarify jurisdiction. It was highlighted that the transfer station, although currently under the Board of Selectmen, presents significant compliance challenges related to MS4 stormwater runoff and OSHA requirements. One participant emphasized the importance of having someone deeply engaged in these compliance matters, stating, “I need someone to sort of dig their teeth into that and help direct those things that need to be done.”

The dialogue stressed the substantial workload involved in managing compliance requirements, which include training and operational protocols. There was a consensus that the current board members lacked the bandwidth to adequately address these issues. Weekly check-ins were suggested to ensure compliance and operational integrity. Budgeting processes would still involve collaboration between both boards, with the Board of Health likely taking the lead on budget-related matters for the transfer station.

Grant opportunities were also discussed, particularly for funding stormwater management compliance measures. The need for certifications and health cards for personnel operating the transfer station was underscored. It was noted that historically, the Board of Health managed the transfer station, providing continuity and a streamlined focus on compliance.

However, concerns were raised about the Board of Health’s capacity to manage the compliance checks for OSHA and stormwater management, given its other functions. The discussion acknowledged the need for a structured compliance check process without implying day-to-day management. The overarching theme was ensuring the transfer station operates within state regulations while addressing operational challenges posed by limited personnel and resources.

After an extensive discussion, the sentiment leaned toward a collaborative approach, recognizing the Board of Health’s compliance expertise. A motion was made to transfer the transfer station oversight to the Board of Health, contingent on their acceptance, and the vote was approved unanimously.

The second major agenda item involved transitioning from imprinted town trash bags to a sticker program. Participants discussed the complexities of implementing such a system, noting challenges in verifying valid stickers and managing trash collection. The current credit card machine’s reliability was questioned due to poor Wi-Fi connectivity, emphasizing the need for better infrastructure like hardwiring for transactions.

Numerous complaints about the quality and quantity of the town’s trash bags were acknowledged, with suggestions to explore better alternatives before fully transitioning to a sticker system. Concerns were raised about how stickers would complicate waste collection and enforcement, particularly with residents potentially using oversized contractor bags with minimal stickers.

The potential switch to a clear bag model was also debated, referencing successful practices in other towns that use clear bags with logos for better monitoring of recycling practices. The need for durable bags that hold up under various conditions was reiterated, emphasizing waste collection efficiency.

The town has faced challenges in sourcing trash bags, with limited responses to bids. The potential for using clear bags was highlighted to improve the situation while considering recycling regulations. Risks of introducing a sticker system were discussed in detail, especially how it might confuse residents and complicate trash collectors’ responsibilities.

Involving the Board of Health in the decision-making process was suggested, recognizing their input as invaluable. Participants expressed the need for collaboration to avoid missteps and address all stakeholders’ needs and concerns. It was confirmed that responses to the request for proposals regarding trash bags would be available by the next meeting, with samples for review.

Another topic was the proposal to relocate movie nights to Central Park. Concerns about approvals from the Freetown Lille Athletic Association (FLA) were addressed, confirming their unanimous support for the events. Discussions included the use of fields by attendees, availability of the concession stand and bathrooms, and the benefits of collaboration with the FLA. The board voted in favor of moving the movie night and approved the agreement with Plymouth Flex.

The board also approved and signed an agreement with Swank for movie licensing and adjusted the schedule for yoga classes at Hathaway Park. A request for exclusive access to the Bandstand and Cultural Center for holiday decorating by the Cultural Council was supported and approved.

Discussions continued on repairs and updates at Freetown Elementary School, emphasizing the importance of completing these during the summer. The board approved necessary documents for these projects and discussed a fiscal year 2025 paving contract, with unanimous approval.

Budget transfer requests and ambulance abatements were reviewed, with a request for further clarification on collection amounts. The board expressed support for a one-day wine and malt license for the Boys and Girls Club fundraiser at Camp Welch.

Other matters included the acceptance of tree services from Beaver Tree Works, a donation of a pool table to the Council on Aging, and a donation from Precision Windows and Kitchen for work at the Council on Aging. The board also discussed the South Main Street sidewalk Phase 2 project, with a motion to initiate a study and use ARPA funds for design fees receiving unanimous approval.

The meeting concluded with discussions on hiring a town planner versus a planning and land use administrator, recognizing the need for experienced oversight in various departments. The resignation of Victoria Alfaro Duran, the planning and land use administrator, was acknowledged, and the board expressed appreciation for her contributions.