The runway project was a focal point, with reports that the aerial surveyor, Blue Sky, had completed its data collection, and processing was underway. The runway is nearly complete, pending grass growth and soil work in certain areas. Testing related to the pavement condition index is scheduled to aid in planning future capital improvements. Additionally, the commission discussed an electrical contractor’s delivery of extra parts, though the purpose remains unclear. A draft stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) was made available, with a submission deadline to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by March. The discussion on SWPPP highlighted the need to address potential pollution sources at the airport, such as aircraft maintenance and fueling, emphasizing the importance of compliance with federal regulations.

The commission also dealt with changes to the airport layout plan, particularly the FAA’s request for clarifications to qualify for Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funding. Removing the term “discretionary” from funding references was agreed upon, aligning with FAA requirements for current project justifications. Building height restrictions were adjusted, establishing a 25-foot line in accordance with local zoning regulations. The commission approved these changes, acknowledging their necessity for compliance.

Further deliberations involved the FAA’s unexpected classification of hazard beacons, now deemed hazardous and requiring removal. This development led to discussions about the historical context of easements dating back to 1962 and the potential impact on grant obligations. The FAA and Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) feedback was incorporated into a revised version of Chapter 6 of the master plan, which included a comment revision matrix. Alternatives concerning apron and hangar layouts were discussed, with MassDOT’s suggestions leading to modifications that included increasing tie-down spots and avoiding wetland areas.

Fiscal year 2025 projects also featured prominently in the meeting, with the FAA and MassDOT’s funding commitments reducing the local share from 5% to 2.5%. This change was positively received, and the commission was urged to confirm the availability of local funds. An environmental assessment is required before further project funding, with the FAA planning to schedule scoping meetings in November. Concerns were raised about the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) component, questioning its necessity and cost implications.

The commission also reviewed fuel turnover rates, reporting promising figures with an average turnover of $3,600 monthly. The city pays upfront for fuel, and a suggestion was made to retain some turnover funds for financial readiness. Insurance policy details were scrutinized, revealing an annual cost of $111,000 for a million-dollar coverage per occurrence. However, the fire damage limit of $50,000 per occurrence raised concerns about its adequacy.

Updates on safety measures included discussions about the alarm system, with a quoted installation cost of $600 and an annual monitoring fee of $264. A previous alarm service provider’s lack of response was noted, along with the need for Verizon to restore the phone line. Plans for overdue fire extinguisher checks were also mentioned, with a fire protection service scheduled to address them.