Bay State Racing LLC’s representatives offered a comprehensive presentation detailing their vision for the proposed equestrian facility, which included a turf track, temporary agricultural facilities, breeding programs, and community events. Addressing the potential economic benefits, the company highlighted job creation, tax contributions, and partnerships with local businesses and educational institutions. Emphasizing their commitment to environmental stewardship, the representatives discussed plans for enhanced stormwater management and adherence to regulations concerning horse welfare.

The company, expressing their intention to become the 54th business in Gardner, aimed to revitalize the local horse population and support the community through wagering revenue and charitable contributions. They also assured the council of their commitment to responsible horse care, safety, and regulatory compliance. Despite these assurances, the presentation was met with scrutiny by council members and a speaker representing Bay State Racing LLC, who faced questions about the impact on the environment, traffic, and the company’s lack of local ownership.

Council members inquired about a range of issues, including the number of thoroughbreds needed for races, the company’s contingency plans in the event of operational failure, and the potential for job creation. The representatives from Bay State Racing reiterated their confidence in the project’s support structure and their commitment to using organized labor, paying prevailing wages, and providing opportunities for permanent employment and internships.

However, community members voiced their concerns during the public hearing segment of the meeting, with topics ranging from water pollution and traffic to noise pollution and quality of life. Bruce Spra, Gerald Stal, and Dorothy LeBlanc were among the residents who opposed the project, citing potential negative impacts on the city’s water supply and increased traffic. Concerns were also raised about the proper vetting of the proposal and the thoroughness of environmental and traffic impact studies.

The potential changes in revenue-sharing models, the timing of revenue flow to the city, and the financial implications of the project were also debated. Additionally, the council discussed non-horse related events on the agriculturally zoned site, with uncertainty about their fit within existing zoning regulations.

In response to public testimony, the council acknowledged the high emotions and requested civil discourse. The public comments touched on the potential negative effects on property values, the fragile state of the water system, and the need for a responsible gaming program. The council stressed the need for comprehensive information before making any final decisions and urged thorough consideration of the proposal’s broader impact on the community.