The revised storm water management approach was a key topic during the meeting, as it was critical to address concerns from the Mass DP and ensure the project adhered to environmental standards. The modifications aimed to mitigate potential impacts on the reservoir by introducing fencing, and to enhance the ecological footprint of the trail by relocating the wetland replication area and stabilizing vulnerable sections. The project team’s engagement in discussions about the Notice of Intent dates, the use of straw within the project, and changes to the size of bordering vegetated wetlands (BBW) and the acreage of the limits of work were particularly emphasized during the meeting.

In addition to environmental considerations, the meeting delved into the fiscal aspects of the project, specifically the scrutiny over the low construction bid received, which was lower than subsequent bids. Concerns were raised about the feasibility of managing the project with such a low bid, particularly the implications for the project’s budget and timeline. The role of the project manager and the responsibilities associated with overseeing the construction process were debated, including potential conflicts of interest involving staff members.

The commission also discussed the details of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPP) and debated the necessity of exceptions pertaining to New England Wetlands mitigation. Concerns about the design and placement of trail features, such as the height of the bottom guard rail of a fence and the inclusion of fabric, as well as the signage with bike and pedestrian symbols, were raised. The placement and accessibility of dog waste stations along the trail were also points of contention, as was the responsibility and frequency of inspections as part of the maintenance plan.

As the meeting progressed, the conversation shifted towards the management of the project. Questions were raised about the total budget, with some hesitancy expressed regarding proceeding with the lowest bid due to potential management challenges. The issue of change orders and their impact on the budget and timeline were also a focus, alongside the responsibilities of the project manager.

The meeting concluded with a motion to approve a revised order of conditions, signaling progress despite the complexities discussed.