Garfield Residents Demand Campaign Promises from School Board

In a recent Garfield School Board meeting, school administration matters and policy debates coincided with the celebration of student achievements.

Among the items of note from the meeting was the recognition of students of the month, a program that honors outstanding academic performance and community service. April’s recipient, Natalya, was lauded for her work ethic, determination, and maturity. In the words of Mr. Bailey, the nominator, “I’m sure she’ll do great things in the future and I’m proud of the person she has become.”

The May honoree, Emily Ortega, was commended in absentia for her exceptional grades and community engagement. June’s awardee, Magnolia Geronimo Herrera, received accolades for her remarkable resilience in transitioning to a new country, learning English, and excelling in her courses.

The meeting also highlighted areas for board growth and accountability, starting with a misstep in protocol related to tabling agenda items and recording votes. Such instances indicated a potential need for a more robust training or clarity in meeting procedures. Another point of contention arose during the public comment period, where a resident questioned the disparity in speaking time allocated at different meetings. She expressed appreciation, however, for the video recording of the meetings.

In the midst of these procedural considerations, board member Aaliyah found herself under scrutiny for campaign promises. These included overturning a tax increase through refinancing the athletic complex, addressing the poor condition of classrooms in trailers, and prioritizing job placements based on qualifications rather than political connections. The board member did not provide an immediate response to these questions during the meeting, reflecting the ongoing challenges the board faces in balancing community concerns and operational realities.

One such reality pertained to the distribution of air filters across the district and the condition of trailers used for classes. In response to concerns raised, Dr. Guzman clarified that air filters were in surplus, while the board explained that trailers were a temporary measure to prevent overcrowding amid school improvements. COVID-19 precautions, they added, had necessitated the shutting down of water services.

Board member Mr. Taylor defended the board’s actions, asserting that they were operating under the guidance of a trusted advisor and making tough decisions to use district resources effectively.

Did we get something wrong? Let us know.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:


School Board Members:

Trending in
New Jersey: