16:47A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the superintendent search, as the board reviewed three candidates, identified only as A, B, and C, to maintain confidentiality. Each candidate brought a wealth of experience. Candidate A possessed a comprehensive educational background with a superintendent license in Minnesota, having served in roles such as school director and principal since 1984. Candidate B shared similar qualifications with experience as an interim superintendent and principal. Candidate C, distinguished by a doctorate in education, offered extensive superintendent experience across multiple districts along with municipal advisory roles.

The board emphasized the urgency of filling the interim position, as the new superintendent must be ready to start by August 1. The selection process involved a thorough vetting of candidates’ backgrounds, experience, and availability. Discussions touched on the possibility of extending any interim appointee to a full-time role, contingent on the board’s future direction and the candidates’ willingness.

Concerns about the candidates’ distance from classroom teaching were raised, questioning their current effectiveness as educators. However, the candidates’ leadership capabilities were highlighted as crucial for the role. The interviews, scheduled to include a 90-minute district tour, were designed to provide deeper insights into each candidate’s potential to lead the district effectively. The board stressed the importance of consistent interview questions to ensure fair evaluation.

03:34In conjunction with the superintendent search, the board received an update on the ongoing building project. Despite issues with rain and plumbing permits, the project is progressing within budget, aided by contingency funds for unexpected expenses. The superintendent noted potential delays in completing the fields on the west side of the building, which may impact baseball and softball activities in the first year.

Moreover, the city’s efforts to secure bonds for a sewer connection line were reported, with bids coming in lower than expected. However, additional engineering costs were noted, which would be incorporated into the operating budget. The superintendent expressed appreciation for staff preparation efforts for the upcoming school year, including the distribution of back-to-school packets and staff development plans.

34:02The board also approved the school calendar for the 2024-2025 academic year. High school students, grades six through twelve, will commence classes the day after Labor Day, with elementary students starting a day later. The calendar approval followed positive feedback from previous open houses, which the board plans to replicate in the coming year.

37:51Attention turned to the long-term facility maintenance (LTFM) plan, requiring annual board approval. The district will maintain existing buildings without significant investments as it transitions to a new facility. The current LTFM plan, a 10-year document, may undergo changes as the district adapts to new infrastructure. The board was encouraged to complete a facilities assessment to guide future budgeting.

In terms of funding, the district receives approximately $240,000 to $260,000 annually based on square footage and building age. This allocation could change as decisions are made regarding the existing buildings. A critical date in February was noted concerning building utilization and allocation.

41:52The board approved the annual fundraisers for fiscal year 2025, focusing on managing event timing to prevent over-soliciting the community. Past successful fundraisers were discussed, with an emphasis on transparency and balanced community engagement.

The employee handbook for 2024-2025 was presented, with few changes from previous years. Notably, a formalized process for additional time off when sick days are exhausted was introduced, requiring pre-approval to ensure consistency. The handbook will be shared with staff during back-to-school training.

A resolution regarding the governance of write-in votes was discussed. Although this change does not directly affect the school board, it was noted as a relief for county vote tallying.