A topic of discussion was the proposed sale of the MUA and the utilization of the proceeds to settle the township’s debt. This issue garnered attention as it directly pertains to the township’s financial management and long-term fiscal health. The dialogue included debates on the potential impact of such a sale and the strategies for debt repayment. However, detailed responses to questions raised by the public were limited.

Another point of interest was the management and regulation of cannabis dispensaries in the township. The council explained that licensing for cannabis facilities is overseen by the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Commission, which means the municipality itself does not control licensing. Despite this, residents were keen to understand the implications of dispensaries on the community, including the switch from medical to recreational licenses. The council stated that the township benefits financially from a 2% tax on cannabis revenue, which amounted to $38,966 in 2023. This highlights the economic aspect of cannabis dispensaries in local governance.

The council also discussed the 24-10 Bond, which pertains to park improvements and the associated financial mechanisms. A member of the public commended the council on securing grant funds to offset the bond amount, but the council had to address an auditor’s recommendation to correct an accounting issue by negating a chapter 159. The potential impact of borrowing at a time of high interest rates was a concern.

The introduction of the 2024 Municipal budget was also a key agenda item, with it being made available for public inspection and hearing. The budget featured an increase in the local purpose tax levy, prompting discussions around the temporary budget and a 4.53 cent increase. During public comments, concerns arose regarding the appropriation of funds, particularly those from the former MUA and the use of open space levy funds. A community member expressed a perception that the majority of open space funds were being allocated to pre-existing projects rather than new open space initiatives.

Public health and safety were also addressed, with residents raising questions about the sharing of hookah bowls at a local lounge and the installation of metal detectors in schools. The council directed these inquiries to the Camden County Health Department and respective school districts, respectively, highlighting the division of responsibilities among local authorities.

During the public comments section, various community concerns were voiced. An individual shared a personal anecdote about the migration of whales, emphasizing the importance of springtime. Others interacted with the council regarding accessibility to detailed budget documents and the level of transparency provided. In response to requests for specific budget information, the council mentioned that the state budget document was available to the general public and expressed a willingness to provide the same information that had been given to the community in the past.

Two individuals addressed the council with concerns, including identity theft, human trafficking, and issues with the local police department. Another spoke about the environmental and health risks of placing solar panels on a landfill, and concerns about police involvement with a mental health center. The council clarified the process for obtaining requested documents and the jurisdiction over the landfill, with another member providing information on the trust agreement and landfill management.

The council also received positive feedback for public works maintaining the bike path, and upcoming community events such as the Art District Festival and the National Day of Prayer were announced.