The proposed sale of the township’s sewer system sparked substantial debate among residents and council members. The sewer system, previously managed by the Municipal Utilities Authority before its dissolution in 2023, is now under the township’s control. The Council is considering two bids: a $52 million offer from Aqua New Jersey and a higher $143 million bid from New Jersey American Water. This decision will ultimately be determined by a public referendum on November 5.

Concerns over transparency and the dissemination of information about the sale were a major focus of the discussion. Resident Dina Hendry emphasized the need for clearer communication, expressing that many residents were in the dark about the implications of the sale. She urged the council to provide more direct access to information, rather than requiring residents to search for it online. A council member responded that the necessary details were available on the township’s website. Hendry critiqued the council’s focus on the benefits of the sale without addressing potential drawbacks, particularly after the initial five years if the sale proceeds.

This exchange underscored a gap in understanding and communication between the council and residents, with residents like Hendry pressing for more comprehensive and accessible information. The tension was further exacerbated by accusations of political bias, as some residents felt the issue of the sale should transcend political affiliations, focusing instead on community welfare.

In addition to the sewer system sale, environmental issues were also discussed. A resident named Mr. Burns raised concerns about the rezoning of Block 14807, Lots 1 and 3, from environmental residential to highway commercial. He highlighted the area’s location within a floodplain associated with Big Lebanon Run, a stream noted for its environmental sensitivity. Burns argued that the rezoning could have detrimental environmental impacts and urged the council to reconsider.

The council maintained that the rezoning aimed to support economic growth. However, the discussion reflected ongoing community concern about balancing development with environmental preservation, a theme echoed in Burns’ subsequent comments about the Hayes property. He advocated for the acquisition of this environmentally sensitive site to expand the township’s open space, urging the council to expedite the process, which had been delayed by the pandemic.

The meeting also included discussions on practical municipal concerns. Shy Smithman and other residents voiced issues with malfunctioning streetlights and the availability of local newspapers, which are important for staying informed about township affairs. Smithman suggested that reliable access to information could be improved by establishing a newspaper stand in town. This request highlighted broader concerns about accessibility and transparency in local governance.