The board’s decision to deny a variance request submitted by residents seeking a new driveway access to their property dominated the meeting’s discussion. The residents, David and Vanessa Jandro, had requested the variance after their initial access permit was denied due to spacing requirements outlined in the county ordinance. The Jandros argued that the access was essential for maintaining the north side of their property, which included servicing a septic system, accessing a well, and removing diseased trees. They expressed frustration over what they perceived as inconsistencies in the application of safety regulations, citing neighboring properties with multiple driveways that had not been flagged for safety issues.

Public Works staff explained that the access management ordinance is designed to address safety and traffic management concerns on county roads, emphasizing that multiple access points in close proximity can increase traffic conflict points. They noted that while sight distance is a consideration, the broader traffic management issues take precedence. The Jandros highlighted the physical barriers on their property, such as a limestone hill and a large retaining wall, which complicated access options and made reliance on a neighbor’s driveway unsustainable.

Legal advisors to the board underscored the importance of adhering to the ordinance, which requires findings that any variance would not unreasonably increase congestion or compromise safety on public roadways. Despite empathy expressed by some commissioners, the board ultimately concluded that the variance could not be justified under current regulations, leading to a motion to deny the request, which passed.

Following the variance decision, the board’s attention turned to the repeal of the Goodhue County official highway map, a move that also held implications for local development. Megan Smith, the Land Use Management Director, outlined the rationale behind repealing the 2004 highway map, which depicted an outdated alignment for County Road 11. The current alignment meets both present and future needs, and the city of Pine Island is working to annex land north of the city, further diminishing the relevance of the old map. The Planning Commission had unanimously recommended the repeal, and the motion passed without opposition.

Another issue was the ongoing discussion of SRO contracts, which are set to expire on June 30th. The board reviewed various cost options for renewing these contracts, taking into account new factors such as payroll taxes for Paid Family Medical Leave and projected increases in health insurance costs.

The commissioners debated whether to adopt a one-year or a two-year contract, with some expressing caution due to uncertainties in school and county funding. One commissioner suggested a one-year contract at a rate of $73,000, reflecting the current going rate, while others noted the fluid nature of funding and the need for further analysis. The board ultimately decided to revisit the contracts in their next meeting, allowing for more comprehensive consideration of the financial and operational implications.

Additionally, a proclamation for Sexual Assault Awareness and Child Abuse Prevention Month was approved.