- Filters
- AZ
- N/A.
- 4/16/26
- 7 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Arizona Corporation Commission addressed concerns regarding the potential impact of the Federal Digital Asset Market Clarity Act on state securities regulation. The Commission unanimously voted to support a letter to the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, aiming to ensure that Arizona retains its jurisdiction to investigate and enforce fraud cases, despite the federal legislation.
- AZ
- N/A.
- 4/15/26
- 67 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent meeting of the Arizona Corporation Commission was dominated by discussions on Tucson Electric Power’s (TEP) application to establish just and reasonable rates, with the involvement of numerous stakeholders presenting challenges in scheduling and handling confidential testimony. The deliberations highlighted the intricate logistics of managing a multi-party hearing while balancing procedural requirements and the need for clear communication.
- AZ
- N/A.
- 4/8/26
- 70 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Arizona Corporation Commission approved a financial adjustment for UNS Electric to manage undercollected funds while tackling illegal robocalls targeting Arizona residents.
- AZ
- N/A.
- 3/26/26
- 32 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Arizona Corporation Commission recently convened to assess Impact Telecom LLC’s application for a certificate of convenience and necessity to provide telecommunications services in Arizona. Key discussions revolved around the company’s financial recovery, operational strategies, and compliance with regulatory requirements.
- AZ
- N/A.
- 3/23/26
- 166 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Arizona Corporation Commission convened to address Liberty Litchfield Park’s proposal for rate increases, driven largely by significant capital investments and inflationary pressures. Liberty’s extensive investments, including over $118 million since the last rate case, were presented as essential for maintaining service reliability and addressing ongoing infrastructure challenges. However, the proposed rate adjustments raised concerns among stakeholders, notably the Residential Utility Consumer Office (RUCO), due to potential financial impacts on consumers.