Belmar Zoning Board Denies Accessory Dwelling Unit Proposal

Overview: In a decision during its latest session, the Belmar Zoning Board denied an application for an accessory dwelling unit, citing concerns over emergency access, parking, and the potential impact on the neighborhood. The proposal, which was a focal point of the meeting, generated considerable debate among board members and the public. Despite the applicant’s assurance that the unit would not be rented and lacked facilities enabling rental, the board was not swayed and voted against the application.

Belmar Zoning Board Approves Classic Car Garage and Home Additions

Overview: In a recent meeting, the Belmar Zoning Board of Adjustment approved two applications that promise to alter the residential landscape of the town. A homeowner’s plan to build a specialized garage for a classic car collection at 504 10th Avenue and another homeowner’s proposal to expand their kitchen and add a family room at 415 9th Avenue were both met with unanimous approval. The approvals followed discussions on the details of the construction plans and their implications on local zoning regulations.

Belmar Zoning Board Approves Housing Projects with Conditions

Overview: In a move for local development, the Belmar Zoning Board approved various housing projects during their meeting on February 22nd, with specific conditions aimed at maintaining the town’s character and adhering to zoning regulations. These projects included the addition of a garage and pool, the construction of a new three-bedroom home, and the expansion of an existing residence with a covered porch. The board also witnessed the swearing-in of new members.

Belmar Zoning Board Approves New Construction and Addresses Notice Discrepancies

Overview: In a recent meeting, the Belmar Zoning Board of Adjustment made notable decisions on property developments and addressed procedural matters. Among the most newsworthy items were the board’s approval of a new single-family home construction and the careful consideration of notice requirements for a proposed 2.5-story building, which led to the application being carried over to a later date for re-notice.