- NJ
- Cape May County
- 4/24/25
- 04/24/2025
- 174 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a Cape May Zoning Board meeting, members addressed several crucial applications and appeals, with the most discussion focused on an appeal against a decision by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). The HPC had denied an application to construct a pool in a historic district, raising concerns about its visibility and impact on the area’s historic character.
- NJ
- Cape May County
- 3/27/25
- 03/27/2025
- 83 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Cape May Zoning Board approved a variance application to convert a multifamily dwelling on Franklin Street into a single-family home, addressing longstanding non-conformities and sparking discussion about traffic safety concerns in the area.
- NJ
- Cape May County
- 2/27/25
- 02/27/2025
- 143 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cape May Zoning Board meeting focused heavily on the interpretation of zoning laws concerning the conversion of detached garage spaces into living accommodations, sparking a detailed debate on the implications for local homeowners. The board also reviewed applications for modifications in the historic district, with particular attention to maintaining the character of the area.
- NJ
- Cape May County
- 1/23/25
- 01/23/2025
- 113 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cape May Zoning Board upheld a zoning officer’s decision regarding a property on Maryland Avenue, which involved the contentious conversion of a detached garage into an outbuilding. The board determined that modifications to the structure, including insulation and drywall installation, implied an intent for human occupancy, thus classifying it as habitable space under local zoning regulations.
- NJ
- Cape May County
- 12/12/24
- 12/12/2024
- 152 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a recent Cape May Zoning Board meeting, a debate unfolded over a proposed six-foot fence on Vento Avenue, sparking discussions about neighborhood character, zoning regulations, and the balance between privacy and aesthetics. The application, brought forth by Christopher Roner, sought a variance for a fence taller than the four-foot limit specified by the city’s zoning ordinance, intending to enclose a swimming pool on a corner lot with three frontages. The board ultimately voted against the proposal despite the applicant’s adjustments, reflecting broader concerns about maintaining the area’s visual harmony.