- FL
- Orange County
- 11/19/25
- 11/19/2025
- 105 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Apopka City Council meeting was marked by a decision to deny a proposed annexation along Saddler Road, following debate over its implications for local infrastructure and growth management. Concerns about the pace of development and its impact on existing infrastructure led to a unanimous vote against the annexation, highlighting the council’s responsiveness to resident feedback. The meeting also covered updates on utility fees and community events.
- FL
- Polk County
- 11/19/25
- 11/19/2025
- 97 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Winter Haven City Commission meeting focused on a variety of topics, with the proposal for a new parking garage in downtown Winter Haven taking center stage. The proposed project aims to address the growing demand for parking facilities due to recent developments and the area’s rapid growth.
- FL
- Miami-Dade County
- 11/19/25
- 11/19/2025
- 67 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a decision, the North Miami Board of Adjustment unanimously approved a variance for a beauty salon to operate at 11073 Northeast 125th Street, despite being located 885 feet from another salon, contrary to the city’s zoning code which requires a 1,500-foot separation. The decision was made after an extensive discussion that highlighted both procedural concerns and community needs.
- FL
- Osceola County
- 11/19/25
- 11/19/2025
- 95 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The St. Cloud Planning Commission meeting focused on addressing multiple code violations related to permitting issues and reducing significant lien fines for property maintenance violations.
- FL
- Pinellas County
- 11/19/25
- 11/19/2025
- 54 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Tarpon Springs Board of Adjustments approved a variance request for Alfred and Edith Slater, allowing a previously unpermitted detached garage to remain on their property with a reduced setback. The decision came after substantial discussion on access, setback implications, and the unique history of the property.