NJ Gov Body
- Filters
- NJ
- Ocean County
- 4/30/25
- 04/30/2025
- 106 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Jackson School Board meeting featured discussions on the renaming of the high school, a restructuring plan affecting district schools, and a detailed review of the upcoming budget. These topics reflect the board’s efforts to enhance educational offerings and manage financial constraints while addressing community concerns.
- NJ
- Ocean County
- 4/10/25
- 04/12/2025
- 26 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Jackson School Board meeting was dominated by a decision to reject a proposed $1 million tax levy incentive aid application. The board members cited concerns over increasing the tax burden on residents and highlighted ongoing issues with the state’s funding formula as reasons for their decision. The board emphasized the need for legislative changes to address the district’s financial struggles.
- NJ
- Ocean County
- 03/26/2025
- 60 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Jackson School Board meeting featured the vibrant Mr. JHS pageant, where Emerson Matthews, dubbed “Mr. President,” was crowned the winner. The evening also included a light-hearted discussion on prom bids and proposals, adding an entertaining layer to the proceedings.
- NJ
- Ocean County
- 3/19/25
- 03/19/2025
- 113 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Jackson School Board tackled issues concerning ethical conduct violations by board members, budget challenges due to state aid reductions, and updates on student activities and performances. Discussions highlighted the district’s financial strains, ethical obligations of board members, and the impact on school programming and operations.
- NJ
- Ocean County
- 2/19/25
- 02/19/2025
- 90 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Jackson School Board announced its decision to sue the state and the Department of Education, citing unfairness in the state’s funding formula as a primary reason. The board highlighted that despite their fiscal responsibility, they are being treated inequitably compared to neighboring districts, some of which received substantial loans.
