Littleton Addresses Septic Concerns and Substance Abuse Strategy

Overview: The Littleton Board of Selectmen convened to deliberate on a range of issues affecting the local community, with considerable time spent on addressing the installation of septic systems on Mil Lane and Birch Road. The meeting also touched on the strategic use of opioid settlement funds, the potential formation of a regional task force on substance abuse and mental health, updating portable toilet regulations, and the classification of private wells. Additionally, discussions on public health addressed the use of portable water for irrigation and the status of infectious diseases in the community.

Littleton Board Tackles Orchard Sale and Public Input Concerns

Overview: At a recent Littleton Board of Selectmen meeting, the potential sale of Nagog Hill Orchard emerged as a key issue, drawing significant public concern and debate among the board members. The discussion revolved around the declaration of the orchard as surplus property and the subsequent steps required to sell it, including the approval of a warrant article. Public concerns were raised about the perceived lack of transparency and input in the decision-making process, prompting the board and the Orchard working group to propose measures to enhance public engagement. These measures include adding two public at-large members to the working group, organizing public input sessions on the criteria for the request for proposal (RFP), and committing to an open public meeting with a joint vote on the final decision regarding the purchaser.

Littleton Board Debates Zoning and Development Standards

Overview: The Littleton Board of Selectmen’s recent meeting centered on development standards, the compliance with the MBTA Communities Act, and potential development options for a property on Foster Street, including senior living and industrial redevelopment. The meeting addressed issues such as the accuracy of the compliance model for development, the calculation of affordable housing requirements, and the inclusion of waivers in the development process. Additionally, the planning board’s conduct was scrutinized, with a request for an apology stemming from previous meeting remarks.