Southwick Zoning Board Grants Variances for Deck Projects Amid Concerns Over Property Lines

Overview: The Southwick Zoning Board of Appeals convened to address multiple variance requests concerning deck constructions at 54 and Berkshire Avenue. The meeting revealed discussions about property line distances, construction methodologies, and neighborly relations, ultimately resulting in unanimous approvals for the variances requested.

Front Setback Variance for New Garage Sparks Debate at Southwick Zoning Meeting

Overview: The Southwick Zoning Board of Appeals meeting focused on several variance requests, with attention given to Richard Paxton’s proposal to construct a garage at his property on Fenton Drive. The board grappled with balancing zoning regulations, neighborhood aesthetics, and the practical needs of applicants. Discussions also touched on wetland considerations for another project and brief updates on accessory dwelling units.

Southwick Zoning Board Discusses New Procedures and Regulation Changes for Auxiliary Dwelling Units

Overview: The Southwick Zoning Board of Appeals recently convened to discuss updates on procedural guidelines for meetings and to address new zoning regulations concerning Auxiliary Dwelling Units (ADUs). The meeting, held on October 28th, featured significant dialogue on streamlining public comment periods and adapting to new state regulations that could impact local zoning practices.

Headline: Southwick Zoning Board Discusses Handling Disruptive Public Comments During Meetings

Overview: In a recent meeting, the Southwick Zoning Board of Appeals addressed the challenges of managing disruptive public comments during contentious hearings, exploring potential strategies to maintain order and decorum in future sessions.

Southwick Zoning Board Grapples with Setback Variances and Environmental Concerns

Overview: In a recent meeting, the Southwick Zoning Board of Appeals addressed issues involving setback variances and potential environmental hazards. The most notable discussions centered on two properties: one at Three George Lumis Road seeking setback variances to rebuild a fire-destroyed house and another at Two Lakemont Street where environmental concerns and the proximity of a proposed garage to a neighboring property sparked debate.